Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
. i . <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />)25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />M a ff 7 a, <br />12 <br />COMMISSIONER MARSHALL noted that there is a disagreement on the <br />dividing of two one -acre lots. The Planning Staff indicated their <br />awareness of this problem and that this would again be restudied for a <br />resolution. She feels that this should also be studied by the study <br />group as well as the extension of sewer into the Rural Buffer. <br />COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER stated that in order to implement this <br />proposal, action will need to be taken by three separate governing <br />bodies. The Chapel Hill Council has not discussed this fully and not <br />expressed their opinion and he believes Carrboro has not fully <br />discussed it either. He would like to have the opportunity for the <br />Council to discuss the entire study so they can decide their position <br />without having any of the options ruled out before doing so. He asked <br />how the Study Committee felt about adopting parts instead of the whole <br />report. Clint Berklin stated he feels it very important to discuss it <br />as a whole package because it is part of a balance of a give and take <br />effort. It is best discussed as an overall package. The Committee <br />would be willing to supply as many committee members to help with the <br />education effort. They have worked with the public during the entire <br />process. If the report was taken apart, they would feel it important <br />to go back to the community groups they have promised the whole <br />package to because it would not be the same thing they took to them <br />before and their comments would not apply. <br />SUBSTITUTE MOTION <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />Commissioner Marshall to refer the entire package to the Governing <br />Boards for consideration and to the Orange County Planning Board for a <br />recommendation to come back to the Board of Commissioners no sooner <br />than October 1. <br />COMMISSIONER HARTWELL WITHDREW THE ORIGINAL MOTION ON THE FLOOR. <br />THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION BECAME THE MAIN MOTION ON THE FLOOR <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />With no further items to be considered at this Joint Planning <br />Public Hearing, Chairman Carey adjourned the meeting. <br />Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk <br />Moses Carey, Jr., Chair <br />