Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
27 <br />,:...;:::; :; •:;,;<,, -::: s <i:/' <�i: >: >iii�Fil' y: <;{:;, r, , "::�;:y:: x>: ....:;::::;r Are >x;: « < >:<i: :rxryy.....`;? ..............:.........,....ii <br />.:i:ii t•::•:• '::`iii :::i::i::i:;:�;::;:� i�: <:: `: ?`:i::i:i' is >:.:i:.......................................... .: : :: ;: ..::s;., : ,;: ',. ?:::!.;::y:. >:i `:: ;:::>::: <:; >:.;:.;: <br />ALTERNATIVE 3 (CHAPEL SILL VERSION): ISSUES, PROS AND CONS <br />This alternative, as read from the Town Council's adopted <br />resolution, would implement only the following items: <br />Development Option A (1.84 -acre lots) <br />Development Option B (4.59 -acre lots) <br />Average Lot Sizing <br />Allow Two 0.92 -acre Lots for Pre - Existing Tracts 20 Acres or Less. <br />The resolution also calls for the County Commissioners and Carrboro <br />Board of Aldermen to join with the Town Council "in forming a work <br />group of elected officials to address the policy issues raised in <br />the recommendations" study committee. <br />If the Board elects to adopt this alternative, reconsideration may <br />be needed by Carrboro. This alternative is a subset of Alternative <br />2, and as such was approved by the Carrboro Board of Aldermen on <br />October 23, 1990. The Joint Planning Agreement may, however, <br />require a new reading of this partial adoption of the strategies. <br />If Carrboro agrees to this alternative, the Joint Work Group <br />proposal would be implemented. The need for a specific charge to <br />such a work group, and a specific time limit would seem appropriate <br />if this alternative is_ adopted. <br />"PROS" OF ADOPTING ALTERNATIVE 3 <br />"CONS" OF ADOPTING ALTERNATIVE 3 <br />i"o ... . : ". ------ <br />.- . #: a Ott ba <br />