Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
24 <br />with Town and County staff to address the concerns of the Chapel <br />Hill Town Council. The Council later determined that several issues <br />remained unresolved to their satisfaction, leading to their <br />February 25 action.) <br />ALTERNATIVES ACTION STRATEGIES FOR THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />With the Commissioners' consideration of this matter scheduled for <br />May, there appear to be three sets of recommendations on the table, <br />along with a fourth potential alternative. <br />1. ADOPT THE "ORIGINAL" LUP -4 -90 (as of August 30, 1990). <br />Since the Study Committee's addendum of September 20, the <br />original recommendations have not been acted upon or discussed <br />outside of Committee meetings. The recent seminar by <br />nationally - renowned attorney Robert Frielich, however, may <br />lend additional credence to this proposal if the issue of <br />limiting sewer taps can be dealt with (as Frielich contends) . <br />2. ADOPT THE SEPTEMBER 20 "AMENDED" VERSION OF LUP -4 -90. <br />3. <br />As previously mentioned, this version was designed to address <br />the concerns mentioned in the August 30 staff analysis and <br />reiterated by the Town Council on September 10, 1990. <br />ADOPT THE PARTIAL VERSION OF LUP -4 -90 (Town Council) <br />This version would approve the five -acre lot and two -acre lot <br />development options, .make three other structural and <br />administrative changes to the plan, and call for a Joint Work <br />Group to study policy issues further. <br />4. LEAVE AS IS. <br />A final. "default" alternative would involve not acting on the <br />recommendations. This would in effect maintain the status quo <br />(two acre lots, no open space strategy) for the buffer. <br />ALTERNATIVE 1 (ORIGINAL): ISSUES PROS AND CONS <br />The original amendments to the JPA Plan reflect the May 24 <br />recommendations of the Study Committee. As previously stated, this <br />version was the one presented at the August 30 public hearing. <br />This version of the proposals were altered after the Chapel Hill <br />Town Council made it clear that they could not support certain <br />