Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
p <br />3W <br />._• <br />W. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Keep as is. Avera <br />sensitive site de <br />allowing some pro <br />an additional lot <br />5. USE OF SQUARE <br />The Committee agre <br />concern takes on r <br />issue with this it <br />based on square fe <br />rather than 2.0 --ac <br />few more lots due <br />lot sizing achieves better and more <br />rn, and is a worthwhile tradeoff in <br />-ty owners to meet set densities with <br />two per 100 developed acres. <br />AGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE <br />d that, like the above issue, this <br />latively minor significance. The <br />m is that using a minimum lot size <br />t (80,000 square feet - 1.84 acres) <br />es (87,120 square feet) might allow a <br />o the slight drop in lot size. <br />The Committee discussed their rationale for this <br />statement - that this type of measurement is consistent <br />with traditional 3.8t sizes in the buffer (prior to <br />1987) and current lot sizes in other rural areas. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Leave as is. Altho gh a less important issue, the <br />provision should b: left for policy -maker decision. <br />SUMMARY OF ADDITIONS/REVISIONS <br />- ___---------------------------- <br />----------------------- --- <br />1. Alternative systems to be allowed rather than <br />extension of public sewer - only when designed, <br />constructed, Monitored and maintained by a reliable <br />public entity to be appointed by the three local <br />governments. <br />2. Rural Villages (Option E) to be evaluated and <br />permitted in accordance with locational criteria <br />that weights major transportation corridors <br />heavily. <br />3. Gradation of public review for 5-acre lot <br />subdivisions as shown on page 3 of this addendum. <br />4. Size limit on lots of record allowed to utilize <br />two 1 -acre lot exception (Less than 20 acres.) <br />5 <br />22 <br />