Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-06-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 05-06-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:50:37 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:39:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
478
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />into a workable plan that provides new development options with <br />respect to these four objectives, as well as incentives for <br />landowners who help meet these objectives by aiding the <br />maintenance of the rural character in the area through <br />environmentally - sensitive practices in future development. <br />The Committee, in its deliberations and meetings with rural <br />residents throughout the County, has come to several <br />recommendations in the form of policy statements. The manner in <br />which these statements address the goals and objectives of the <br />study can be examined by looking at the study's components. <br />1. Agricultural Preservation <br />The need to preserve agricultural land is a long -term need. It <br />goes beyond the short -term economics of agriculture as a <br />business, to the long -term food production needs of society. <br />Farming is resource - dependent, and therefore much of the <br />attention is based on the resource - the land. But the land is <br />valuable for food production only when there are farmers who can <br />make a living in agriculture. The amount of land in farms and the <br />amount of farms themselves has declined dramatically since 1955. <br />Since 1982, the County has lost another 13% of its farms, and <br />another 11% of its land in agriculture. <br />The Committee has met with a number of rural residents. In these <br />meetings, including the Rural Buffer, this loss of land and <br />difficulty in making a living in agriculture was a significant <br />concern. But of an equal concern was any potential loss in the <br />farmers investment in his land, since the land serves as the <br />farmer's pension - providing savings for retirement and other <br />family needs. <br />Mindful of these concerns, and in order to be receptive to the <br />needs and concerns of farmers and rural residents, the Committee <br />has gathered input from these residents, as well as the members <br />of the farm community on the Committee itself. This has led the <br />RCSC to recommend the following direction for the protection of <br />agriculture in the Rural Buffer. <br />1. The Committee recognizes agricultural activities as being in <br />keeping with the preservation of open space and the <br />protection of resources. The committee recommends that <br />agricultural activities should be a permitted land use in <br />designated open space set asides. <br />2. The Committee recommends that.a Purchase of Development <br />Rights system be instituted and used-as a tool to assist the <br />farm community and other users. <br />3. The Committee endorses and recommends an Expedited <br />subdivision review process to allow large -tract owners (such <br />as farmers) to subdivide small parcels of land as needed for <br />family members and other purchasers, as this will enable <br />many farmers to realize small immediate needs without <br />complete subdivision and sale of the farm. <br />4. The Committee endorses the "Right To Farm" law, and further <br />recommends that the County adopt the provisions and <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.