Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 04-01-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:46:23 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:34:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
576
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br />DRAFT- MARCH 18.1 1991 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />one of the recommendations of the Area Study is <br />that local and civic groups check into the <br />possibility of establishing a local Habitat <br />n N chapter. Stancil continued that at the February <br />I1 � y <br />12 meeting some were concerned that this <br />recommendation would encourage development of <br />low - income housing in the community. The <br />majority seemed to view this recommendation as <br />something to "look into" rather than a <br />recommendation to create low income housing. <br />MOTION: Burklin moved to adopt the recommendation of the <br />Planning Staff. Seconded by Eddleman. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />b. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments. <br />(1) Golf Driving Ranges <br />(a),Article 4.3 Permitted Uses <br />(b) Article 8.8 Special Uses <br />(c) Article 22 Definitions <br />A presentation was not required. A copy of the <br />abstract and proposed amendment are attachments <br />to these minutes on pages . <br />6 <br />Eidenier stated that one of the Commissioners , <br />asked that the Planning.Board reconsider this <br />item very carefully. The concern was that placing <br />a commercial /recreational facility in an <br />agricultural /residential area might set.a bad <br />precedent. <br />Eddleman expressed concern with the lighting and <br />the effect on surrounding residences. <br />Burklin stated he had seen driving ranges which <br />N _ <br />were simply an extension of a golf course and <br />those that eventually became almost an amusement <br />park with video games and batting cages which <br />.,.7z% r__: <br />created a deal of noise and problems for the <br />T: - - -? 7'`- ` °''w'ae: "��' °`' <br />surrounding area. He continued that he felt this <br />-;,- eras a use which would require some standards. <br />Kirk stated that in this case a batting cage <br />could not be built..:. -.It is a recreational use for <br />prof it. Golf driving d practice ranges under <br />this definition does not allow for putt -putt <br />=:�,.> ter. Mr• r-, h ..a...c^.r::r74 %:- <br />courses or gamerooms. <br />ll addressed the requirements from other <br />,jurisdictions <br />asking if lighting had been <br />estioned. Kirk responded that to address <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.