Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-06-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 03-06-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:33:47 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:31:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/1991
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This item will be discussed and voted upon at upcoming <br />meetings of the Chapel Hill Town Council and the Orange County <br />Board of Commissioners. If passed, the General Assembly will be <br />asked to pass enabling legislation. <br />ORANGE COUNTY IMPACT TAX <br />Mr. Gledhill mentioned that the Impact Tax would be much more <br />manageable than trying to administer an Impact Fee. The Impact Fee <br />would require a nexus be established between the development which <br />is occurring and the infrastructure which that development would <br />require. It is a complicated process to keep that nexus in place. <br />That would not be required with an Impact Tax. The tax money <br />would be used for the same purposes. It would be held in capital <br />trusts and would be reserved to be used for the infrastructure that <br />the development creates, however, the calculations would not need <br />to be done. He indicated that this would be a tax on current <br />construction and would not be retroactive. <br />Council Member Preston stated that there is a great deal <br />already required of developers in Chapel Hill. They must pave the <br />roads, landscape, dedicate recreation land, and protect trees. <br />This Impact Tax could place an undue burden on them. <br />Commissioner Willhoit agreed that they are required to do <br />those things, however, they are not required to do anything for the <br />schools. The two systems are requesting upwards of $90,000,000 in <br />capital improvements which could be a property tax impact unless <br />other action is taken. He pointed out that if it were a fee it <br />would be relatively simple to define the impact on water and sewer <br />for residential development. Establishing the impact on the <br />schools would require changing the wording so that it was clearly <br />applicable within all of Orange County. <br />Mr. Gledhill indicated that the Impact Fee authority that the <br />Town has covers their planning jurisdiction. The County's Impact <br />Fee authority covers its planning jurisdiction. There is no <br />overlap. The Impact Tax would be imposed on all development in the <br />County, not just in on section. <br />Commissioner Willhoit remarked that the real impact is in <br />providing the additional classrooms. The largest percentage of the <br />increase in property taxes over the years has been for the schools. <br />The Impact Tax could help offset that increase in the future. <br />Council Member Andresen indicated that she believes further <br />study of the issue isneeded to determine the consequences this tax <br />will have on local developers. <br />Mr. Gledhill indicated that the Impact Tax proposal had two <br />features. It has a district in which the revenue is divided <br />between the town and county, with the town getting the tax <br />collected on development within the Town's jplanning jurisdiction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.