Orange County NC Website
DISTRIBUTED <br />4'x:7 Hwy 54W <br />Chape.1 Hill, NC 7`16 <br />February 2, 1991 <br />54 <br />Dear Chairman Carey: <br />li)rY wnl11;J lira to go on record as be ni g against. the E =r :roaal `. <br />make Highway 54W a four lane road. We have lived on Hwy 54 since 196,8 <br />and witnessed the changes that the former widening proauced. For us, <br />the most devastatir:,� change resulted form a reroutine of drainage <br />water in our area from both sides of 54 to the south side. Thus the <br />i Rhino- k,ilt's _cit t_ ; <br />W'1tr.r draining of �.:ZC 11:i�'�^'r'Tw��L ;S �L]rr �C :��. �Ji <br />lies iltiori17i3 lo-t and otddltio -,al large but IlorC p'JrnL;ti <br />.rea.s prI the n�rt.] side is shLlnted to a shall creek on the south side <br />Mich ro;.�es our property. Ancther d�,ainage ditch annin:g <br />Lack line Of =,ur property also carries water fr -:n the north side tc, <br />our creek which ultimately drains into Mc:rg.an 'reek. Needless t. L7�Yr, <br />the volume .-)f water handlW'j by our creek has greatly increased cauaing <br />flooding and occasionally washing cut the private road which serves _is <br />and five ,other fair ilwes . Other severe erosion caused by this f loOdir _T <br />has resulted in the, loss of Dur gard?ns., iawns (albeit temporary* <br />but rE-quiring rp'.-�uii.lin . ;,, an_i fruit trees. <br />We have seen Highway 54 c`,ar.ge from a rough, lightly traifi, -4:.e <br />country road to a broad thoroughfare that is the primary lint= to <br />Burlingt -on, (3raham, Green =:boro and points west. 1t now carries huge <br />volumes of high -speed traffic producing increased exha-lYt emisTi or.- <br />and an amazing amount of noise �A]ra`.eurs in : r,it'ao' ogy, we have <br />difficulty hearing the birds.) <br />We deplore these highly undesirable changes brought about by the <br />previous widening of Highway 54. We can only believe that the pro- <br />posed project to add two lanes to this highway would significantly <br />worsen these environmental problems and would very likely prc:)duce <br />other nesat.ive effects. We are -trongly opposed to this project and, <br />hope that it will never be enacted. We much prefer that the state <br />develops a mass transit system connecting significant North Carolina <br />areas; of population. <br />Sincerely. yours <br />a1. Keller <br />e <br />? {.11cr <br />