Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25. <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 ... <br />41 <br />42'. . <br />3 <br />44 <br />45 <br />_46 <br />�47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />33 <br />the record. In essence she voiced OWASA's concern about possi <br />A ro'ect on the quality of Cane Creek <br />61 <br />,le <br />nd <br />effects of the propose p <br />University Lake water supply reservoirs. OWASA is concerned about he <br />direct effects of the construction work itself, and about the lon er <br />term effects of increased traffic and subsequent activities that may <br />follow the project. A copy of the complete letter is in the permanent <br />agenda file in the Clerk's Office. <br />JANE KELLY purchased and restored an old home on NC 54. She <br />spoke in opposition of the proposed widening of NC 54 stating it wo ld <br />destroy her property. She questioned why North Carolina is first in <br />highway construction and last in education. <br />MIRIAM MURDOCK spoke in opposition of widening NC 54. She <br />agreed with all the environmental concerns stating that not only would <br />this destroy homes but it is most inappropriate at this time. The State <br />cannot afford it and it is no time for more highways and more cars. <br />Funds should be diverted to more needed social and educational things. <br />She suggested a rail line between Chapel Hill and Burlington as an <br />alternative means of travel. She asked that the Board not encourage <br />more automobiles. She feels the widening of NC 54 is not inevitable and <br />stated that now is the time to stop proposal. <br />HENRY WILSON, owner of Wilson and Staples Auto Service, <br />s He express d a <br />stated that this widening would take his busines . <br />concern about the people who may be hurt by this widening. <br />of money being spent on public transportation. <br />He approves <br />JAMES ASBAUGH stated that when 54 was redone in the 7 <br />money was allocated in 1956. If DOT had thought it through then, <br />would have changed some things at that time instead of doing it <br />He questioned the traffic count of 6,000 vehicles per day and asked <br />that count was conducted -- before Highway 40 was opened or after. <br />feels this is a shortcut for trucks and widening would increase tra <br />on NC 54 and create a need for a weigh station. He noted that Sout <br />Bell has a fiber -optic line along NC 54 which would need to be movec <br />the widening. Also, one of the main feeders to University Lake , <br />.have to be crossed. The widening of NC 54 will cause more runoff <br />erosion of the .andeneeds feels <br />to be studied intersection a solution. Fayetteville Roac <br />NC 54 is dangerous <br />PETER TODD, member of the Sierra Club and Orange G <br />Greens , made reference to a transportation a stud to work Tt gethe <br />study points our the need for governments <br />- coordinate their transportation needs. He advocates that no acti <br />taken before 1992. This would give all the governing bodies tip <br />�. . <br />respond to the land use issues. He referred to an EDC target v <br />. He feels th i <br />group which advocated development of Highway 54s <br />encourage sprawl and further promote congestion and increase air, <br />and soil pollution. Another primary concern is that Highway 54 <br />through several feeders of the University Lake Watershed. He doe <br />feel this project is financially prudent. The highway fund is prof <br />rs <br />hey <br />ow. <br />hen <br />He <br />fic <br />for <br />ould <br />and <br />and <br />This <br />to <br />n be <br />P to <br />.sory <br />could <br />rater <br />goes <br />> not <br />