Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-04-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 02-04-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:24:54 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:21:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />1 John Link summarized the child care subsidy crisis in Orange <br />2 County. He stated that six non- profit community day care centers which <br />3 have historically served subsidized children are in serious financial <br />4 crisis and are in jeopardy of closing because of a lack of children who <br />5 can afford to pay the cost of care. The United Way, Day Care Services <br />6 Association, Town of Chapel Hill, Village Companies Foundation and <br />7 concerned individuals have raised or contributed approximately $22,000 <br />8 for child care subsidy in the past two months. These efforts have riot <br />9 been able to fully meet the need. <br />10 Social Services Director Marti Pryor -Cook distributed information <br />11 on the current child day care situation in Orange County. She stated <br />12 that the problem is a lack of funding. In 1988 -89 they received <br />13 $517,000 to purchase child care for low income families. Of that amount <br />14 $91,269 was County funds. In 1989 -90 they received $474,000 to purchase <br />15 care while in 1990 -91 they received $354,000 which is a 320 decrease in <br />16 funding. Relief in the form of federal dollars is expected. It is <br />17 anticipated that more than twenty -two million dollars will be available <br />18 for the subsidy program and for child care in general in North Carolina. <br />19 The children on the waiting list will be first to receive these funds. <br />20 Orange County has approximately 600 on the waiting list. This act will <br />21 also expand the number of working poor who will be eligible to receive <br />22 subsidy dollars. Marti Cook explained the recommendation that state <br />23 subsidy dollars be maintained "minimally at the current level" means <br />24 that they would like the State to maintain their current efforts -- a <br />-}25 maintenance of effort. <br />126 She just received a copy of the State's plan for the new child <br />27 development block grant funds and will read and assess this to determine <br />28 if the state dollars have been maintained minimally. <br />29 Commissioner Willhoit pointed out that although it is known that <br />30 federal funds are forthcoming, the local delegation should encourage the <br />31 State to use their resources in combination with the federal funds to <br />32 serve all the children on the waiting list regardless if it is a <br />33 maintenance of effort or not. The goal should be that the State serve <br />34 all the kids on the list at a level that the day care centers can <br />35 survive on. <br />36 Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />37 Commissioner Halkiotis to approve (1) a $20,000 one time emergency <br />38 allocation from contingency funds for the DSS child care subsidy program <br />39 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 1990 -91, to enable low income families <br />40 to secure and maintain employment, (2) support the Day Care Resources <br />41 Task Force in developing long -range strategies to address the need for <br />42 day care subsidy, and (3) to urge the legislative delegation to give <br />43 priority to funding children on the waiting list and to increase the <br />44 subsidy to more fairly reflect the cost of providing the care. <br />45 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />46 <br />47 B. ZONING ENFORCEMENT CASES CIVIL PENALTIES <br />48 Jim Hinkley, Zoning Enforcement Officer, asked that the Board <br />49 consider making written demand for payment of civil penalties in four <br />50 respective cases. Two property owners - the McDuffies and McMillans <br />�51 were given an extension of time by the Board until January 17, 1991. <br />52 In both cases little or no additional perceivable progress to correct <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.