Orange County NC Website
I <br />To establish a ro riate water <br />pp p policies for regional and <br />local areas -- including consolidation or reorganization of <br />domestic water supply within the framework of national <br />needs, comprehensive studies should be made to ensure <br />planning for -the most economical use of water for domestic <br />industrial and other purposes and to prevent waste." Those <br />in North Carolina who would indicate that we have a serious <br />water supply problem that needs to be addressed relative to <br />interbasin transfer have not taken a good look at the facts <br />regarding Water Resources in North Carolina. I would submit <br />to you that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." <br />In North Carolina the average annual runoff reported by the <br />U.S. Geological Survey in 1985 was 47.6 billion gallons per <br />day. Of this runoff, approximately 20 billion gallons per <br />day flowed into other states and 27.6 billion gallons per day <br />flowed through North Carolina into the ocean. During 1985, <br />there was approximately 7.9 billion gallons per day (16.6%) <br />was withdrawn from North Carolina streams and rivers. Of <br />this volume of water, approximately 0.4 billion gallons per <br />day (5.690 was consumed and not returned to the steams and <br />approximately 7.5 billion gallons per day (94.4%) was <br />returned to the these streams. The approximately 0.4 billion <br />gallons of water which was consumed, represents only 0.9% of <br />the total runoff for -North Carolina. These consumptive losses • <br />were attributed to the following: 0.33% for agriculture use, <br />0.07% for thermoelectric power use, 0.17% for industrial use <br />and 0.33% for domestic and commercial uses. As you can see <br />from the above information, North Carolina is a very water <br />rich state. Except as outlined in the AWWA policy, there <br />should not be any water crisis in North Carolina for a very <br />long time and the issue of interbasin transfer cannot be <br />demonstrated to.be of a serious enough issue to warrant <br />immediate attention. The proposed Bill to be considered by <br />the 1991 Legislature would regulate transfers of water from <br />one "river" basin to another. In the Bill, a river means any <br />body of water bearing the designation "river" on the latest <br />edition of the appropriate U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute <br />quadrangle map. A river basin means the area drained by a <br />river and its - ,tributaries or through a specified point on a <br />river, as determined by the commission. A transfer means the <br />withdrawal, diversion, or pumping of surface water from one <br />river basin and the use or discharge of all or any part of <br />the water in a basin different from the origin. The proposed <br />Bill would require a permit for'any transfer of 1 MGD or more <br />and would require that all transfers no matter what there <br />size that are less than 1 MGD be registered with the <br />Commission. Although not clear in the Bill, it is assumed <br />that references to the Commission means the Environmental <br />Management Commission. AEk <br />K <br />