Agenda - 12-18-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

R area. However, a delay in construction has resulted in part from the inability to locate a site for the community well that could be approved by the-State.) (2) the quality of and length of time of the experience of the subdivider in managing, development projects; and (No information was provided regarding the developer s experience in project implementation.) (3) whether factors other than market conditions and beyond the control of the subdivider caused a delay in meeting the phasing plan; and (The applicant has encountered difficulty in locating a suitable well site for the community water system. In addition, there has been a change in personnel coordinating the project. Both factors resulted in a delay in proceeding with Searle Farms Subdivision. In addition, 31 lots in one phase is considered large for a standard subdivision. However, in a cluster development, one large phase is preferable to several smaller phases, because it facilitates acquisition and /or development of open space.) (4) whether the development project, if completed consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat, will tend to aid or meet an important public policy goal established by the Board of County Commissioners; and (If Searle Farms can be completed as previously approved, a significant amount [33* acres] of open space would be protected, including floodplain along New Hope Creek. Preserved open space through clustering would protect natural and visual resources as well as water quality in the creek. Cluster development also provides for energy conservation. Protection of natural resources and water quality, and promoting energy conservation are all important public policy goals.) (5) whether the application for an amended phasing plan was submitted before the previously approved time limit(s) has lapsed; and