Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 e. <br />Efland, EDC member, noted that the Commission is <br />aware of this particular concern and it will be <br />included in the review and discussion process. <br />Best suggested that the wording throughout the <br />proposed Resolution of Agreement be consistent <br />using the phrase "which may include but are not <br />limited to" rather than the mixture of "including <br />but not limited to ", and, "which may include but <br />are not limited to ". Collins agreed this could <br />be done. <br />Waddell expressed appreciation for the spirit of <br />cooperation between the Planning Staff and EDC <br />Staff in the preparation of the Resolution of <br />Agreement. <br />Eidenier asked for comments from the Planning <br />Board and EDC regarding the addition of zoning <br />the two unzoned townships (Little River and Cedar <br />Grove), which would become A 4. She continued <br />that she felt this agreement would not work <br />unless every township was governed by the same <br />rules; especially when there is a unified <br />ordinance. She advocated zoning of the <br />two townships as essential to the agreement. <br />Efland responded that he felt this would be the <br />mixing of a very volatile and major issue at a <br />very late juncture. Eidenier responded that she <br />felt it was an early juncture but she did <br />understand and appreciate Efland's concerns. She <br />continued that she did want the two Boards to <br />sign the agreement but still asked for serious <br />discussion regarding the zoning of the two <br />townships. She noted again that she did not feel <br />much would be accomplished unless zoning did take <br />place. She indicated that pressure for zoning of <br />Little River.Township would be forthcoming from <br />the State due to watershed protection measures. <br />Best expressed concern that without the zoning of <br />the two northern townships, much of the agreement <br />would not apply to the entire county. <br />EDC member, Steve Yuhasz, stated that he felt <br />that the issue of zoning or, at least, a time for <br />zoning would be reviewed discussed within the <br />context of the agreement. However, he agreed <br />with Efland that this would be a very major issue <br />to be included as part of the agreement at this <br />late date. <br />Eddleman asked about item D2, which indicates <br />that there would be a single may for use <br />