Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-16-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 10-16-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:03:56 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 9:58:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/16/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />Excerpt from 5/29/go Public Hearing Minutes <br />2 <br />error in the Zoning Atlas by shifting the EC -5 district west to its proper location <br />and out of the right -of -way; and 2) extend the district three (3) feet to the north so <br />that the structure and a proposed addition will meet required setbacks. <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING BOARD OR <br />CITIZENS. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Hartwell, to <br />approve the proposed rezoning from AR to EC -5 as per the Planning Board's <br />recommendation. <br />NOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />D. ASSIGNMENT OF HOUSE & BUILDING NUMBERS <br />1. Rural Route 7 - Hillsborough <br />2. Rural Routes 1 & 7 - Durham_ <br />This presentation was made by Marvin Collins. In summary this item was <br />presented to receive citizen comment on proposed house and building numbers to be <br />assigned to Orange County Rural Route 7 served by the Hillsborough Post Office and <br />Rural Routes 1 and 7 (partial) served by the Durham Post Office. <br />QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE'BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING BOARD <br />Commissioner Hartwell indicated that he has received inquires about road names. <br />Collins informed the Board that if a road was previously named, a Public Hearing wo ld <br />be needed to change the name. For a road without a name, the wishes of citizens wh <br />live on that road would be taken into account. <br />Chris Best stated that he felt the Emergency Management employees would greatly <br />benefit from a one -time training class which would explain the new Enhanced 911 <br />system. They need to have a thorough understanding of the grid system in each <br />district so that they can continue to serve the public in the shortest amount of tine <br />possible. <br />Chairman Carey indicated that he had received several letters from citizens who were <br />scheduled for address changes. These people do not feel confident that this will be <br />the last time their addresses will change. <br />COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS C <br />Mr. Bob Haas indicated that when he first moved to this area the road he lived on <br />was called Old Chapel Hill Road. Over the years the road has gradually come to be <br />known as Old 86. He spoke in opposition to this road being officially named Old 86. <br />He stated that he believed it was confusing to have two roads with such similar names. <br />Mr. Mark Johnson, a Chapel Hill resident and a member of .the Cornwallis Hills <br />Property Owners Association, spoke in opposition to the renumbering in their <br />development. He suggested that the numbers not be changed in that portion of <br />Cornwallis Hills which is developed. A letter from the Cornwallis Hills Property <br />Owners Association outlining their opposition to this renumbering is in the permanent <br />agenda file in the Clerk's office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.