Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-16-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 10-16-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:03:56 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 9:58:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/16/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h <br />- - 41 <br />Route s# -1, 130x 121 <br />Hi 1 1sboraush. NIC 2:272+ <br />""gust 21. :990 <br />ft <br />orange ro:Jrrty <br />P. C. Box 9151 <br />Hillsborc-agh, <br />Board of Commis_'ioner= <br />1•dor th Caro 1 i na 27270 <br />Dear Sirs and Madam: <br />Thank veu fer the opportunity to participate in what I thought <br />would be a fair hearing of the desires of the lundownFr= alrnr� <br />our road held last night. After the hearing on Play 29, 1990, I <br />felt real good about the manner in which you handled our request <br />and 7roceeded to move on the petition that you asked us to <br />secL:r e . <br />Our honest effort on the petition seems to have fallen cn deaf <br />ears. We would have hoped that sixty -five (65!> percent of the <br />landowners on our road favoring a name change to Old Chapel Hill <br />Drive would have received more respect. These citizens and <br />landowners deserve the right to the pride which comes with living <br />on a street or road named according to their choosing. The <br />climate of the meeting last night was that you are willing to <br />ignore, not only the petitioners, but those who spoke in favor of <br />the renaning because only ONIE landowner s:-oke against it- <br />In the hearing you allowed the presentation of evidence of "some- <br />eighty names- of people who are not even landowners along cur` <br />road: you a -lso allowed one person to 5ugg95t that he co+ald get - <br />seventy or eighty names of people against the Change from <br />Hillsborough to Carrborc. No one informed the person that v,P arc_ <br />not dealing with - the entire road, but just from I -E5 to P -!ew <br />Hope /Arthur Minnis Road. (•then we first started working our <br />petition, vie tN_re told � t _ P la nn i n Department that :h -- <br />would <br />only Cr;rrcider names of aCtUal landowners aloe orar road. I <br />cervainly appears that the planning people are now using dirty, <br />uncerhanded tri =k5 in order to gain ;,heir desires. I would "lope <br />th:a- the Comm;- s5ioner5 v,ould .gat allow this. <br />Regarding the letter from Ms. R.igsbee of the Town of Hillsboroug`I <br />zlannina Board. I have learned that her letter (cn Town <br />sta : i Dnery) ::as not author i zed by the Town Board!. and I w:z s t .:I 1 d <br />b z ^e Ni ? . s5_�ough author i t�/ that ! Pr �C :ion .ra_ i of 1uet.c.ed r1 <br />:1:- :.1 t ti�� r� i•:r:o ) 5 (= �11riR? =yLd t•11 th c': �•O= �CS?rr c,`�C'i+t. -�r'.y t, 2r <br />have spn�:c:-, t I'Ir. '_i tt^�4:rt v:ho 141d <br />*.hat he d_fl '%fit oppL,sP the Old Chapel r-!i l l name- and that h;_ <br />L— i 7'c A 1 (.lttC'r- to this PffP. Doe,.; t.h .C-; ree- f <br />t �,rr:►5� n f' <br />F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.