Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />) 27 <br />'28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />'53 <br />54 <br />go M'a ff 7 <br />districts. Sale of only those goods which are custom --made could o <br />on -site. <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by <br />Commissioner Halkiotis, to refer these items to the Planning Board for <br />a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br />sooner than October 1, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />S. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />a. Section.IV -B -1 Lot Standards <br />This presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary <br />item was presented to receive public comment on a proposed amendme <br />to establish minimum lot sizes needed to accommodate various types <br />wastewater disposal and water supply. It is recommended that 40,0 <br />square feet remain the minimum lot size where both a well and sept <br />tank are used. Where there is no well,the lot size could be reduc <br />to 30,000 square feet. Where there is no well, the lot size could <br />reduced to 30,000 square feet. Where there is both public water a <br />sewer, the minimum lot size is recommended to remain 15,0000 squar <br />feet. If an easement is proposed for use by another property, an <br />additional 20,000 square feet is needed to accommodate a septic <br />disposal system. <br />t <br />of <br />0 <br />c <br />be <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by <br />Commissioner Halkiotis, to refer these text amendments to the Planning <br />Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br />Commissioners no sooner than October 1, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS T <br />b. Section III -C -2 Application Requirements <br />(Minor Subdivision - Final Plat) <br />This presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary this <br />item was presented to receive public comment on a proposed amendment <br />to require that eight (8) copies of the Final Plat for a minor <br />subdivision be submitted with the application. Five (5) copies of the <br />Final Plat are now submitted with an application for Final Plat <br />approval for minor subdivision. Additional copies are needed for <br />distribution to the appropriate utility providers and school distr'ct. <br />The cost to the applicant of supplying additional copies of the pl t <br />would not exceed one (1) dollar per copy, according to two local <br />surveyors. <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by <br />Commissioner Halkiotis, to refer these items to the Planning Board for <br />a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br />sooner than October 1, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />6. PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS <br />V, <br />