Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - QPH
>
Agenda - 11-14-2017 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 8:40:32 AM
Creation date
11/3/2017 9:30:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-14-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40 <br /> II. SPECIFIC COMMENTS: <br /> A. NARRATIVE: Staff has the following specific comments associated with the <br /> project narrative: <br /> 1. Staff is concerned there are conflicts between `appendices' and `sections' <br /> of the narrative. We recommend reviewing the product with the applicant <br /> to ensure these concerns are addressed. <br /> 2. Part 2-3 Performance Standards (page 14 of the narrative) Section 2-3-1 <br /> Land Use Intensity number 2 indicates there will be a minimum <br /> percentage of landscape area/open space of 20%. <br /> The minimum open space area for this project will have to be 30% in <br /> order to comply with existing stormwater permitting requirements. <br /> 3. Throughout the narrative you outline the minimum land use intensity <br /> standards that will guide the development of the project. It would appear <br /> in most instances you are `copying' existing standards detailed within <br /> Section 6.4 Performance Standards of the UDO. <br /> Staff recommends you modify the narrative to indicate you shall abide by <br /> County regulations as currently contained within the appropriate section(s) <br /> of the UDO and only specify those standards you wish to deviate from. <br /> Please note you will have to provide an analysis of the need for the revised <br /> standard and how the purpose and intent of existing regulation(s) shall be <br /> abided by. <br /> 4. Part 2-3-3 General Performance Standards (page 19 of the narrative) <br /> Section 1 Environmental staff has the following comment(s): <br /> a. Subsection (b) — Staff interprets this provision and requiring a 5 <br /> foot freeboard elevation for development within the project versus <br /> the County's existing 2 foot freeboard requirement. <br /> Staff agrees with the suggested limitation. <br /> b. Subsection (b) — The section indicates no development, including <br /> roadway,parking, etc. will occur within identified floodplain areas. <br /> This is consistent with the provisions of Section 6.6.1 of the UDO. <br /> c. Subsection (b) iv — The section appears to indicate a 50 ft. wide <br /> `stream buffer' will be observed for the project. <br /> Staff will be recommending the project comply with existing <br /> development standards associated with the development in and <br /> round stream/floodplain buffers shall comply with the provisions <br /> of Section 6.13 of the UDO. <br /> Required stream and floodplain buffers shall be based on the slope <br /> of the property and shall range from 65 to 80 ft. based on same. <br /> 5. Part 2-3-3 General Performance Standards (page 20 of the narrative) <br /> Section 1 Environmental there are provisions outlining standards <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.