Orange County NC Website
DRAF�- <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 A motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to <br />4 refer the proposed Environmental Impact Ordinance and related amendments to the <br />5 Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance to the Planning Board for a <br />6 recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 6th. <br />7 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />8 <br />9 F. ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS <br />10 <br />11 1. Z -3 -90 BINGHAM TOWNSHIP <br />12 This presentation was made by Emily Crudup. In summary this item was <br />13 presented to receive citizen comment on a proposed Zoning Atlas amendment in Bingham <br />14 Township. The purpose of the rezoning is to make the Zoning Atlas consistent with the <br />15 Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. When the Land Use Plan for Bingham <br />16 Township was updated on September 6, 1988, portions of the Agricultural Residential <br />17 areas were changed to Rural Residential. To make the Zoning Atlas consistent with the <br />18 Comprehensive Plan, the Rural Residential areas must be rezoned to Residential -1. <br />19 Most of the property proposed for rezoning is located on the south side of NC Highway <br />20 54 near the White'Cross Rural Community Activity Node. A smaller portion is located <br />21 on the north side of Dairyland Road (SR 1177) west of Dodsons Crossroads (SR 1102). <br />22 The current zoning is Agricultural Residential. Residential -1 zoning is recommended <br />23 to provide the consistency referenced above. <br />24 <br />25 QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR THE PLANNING BOARD <br />26 <br />27 Commissioner Hartwell indicated that the questions centered around what to do with <br />28 specific parcels. The Land Use Plan and the Zoning Atlas need to be in compliance <br />29 with each other. Amending the Land Use Plan is a viable option here for excluding the <br />30 parcels in question. <br />31 <br />32 In response to a question from Commissioner Willhoit, Crudup indicated that the <br />33 reason for not permitting on- premises sales was that R -1 is primarily for residential <br />34 purposes. With on- premises sales you increase the intensity of land use in a <br />35 residential area. This additional traffic is expected in Agricultural zoning. <br />36 <br />37 Bob Goggins indicated that he does have a road maintenance agreement. The primary <br />38 purpose of his greenhouse is to grow vegetables to sell at the Farmer's Market, <br />39 however customers occasionally do come directly to the greenhouse. His goal is to <br />40 assure that on- premises sales are disallowed. A copy of his statement is in the <br />41 permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office. <br />42 <br />43 Commissioner Hartwell mentioned that AR, not R -1, was established far agriculture. <br />44 AR permits a wide range of businesses, including greenhouses. It would appear to be <br />45 an appropriate zoning category for the operation under discussion. <br />46 <br />47 Mr. Craig Burch asked for clarification of the restrictions for on- premises sales. <br />48 Mr. Collins explained that when an area is designated R -1 it is a statement that the <br />49 area is going to become predominantly residential. The goal is to protect the <br />50 residential integrity of neighborhoods that developed in that area. Commercial <br />51 operations are restricted as a result of this goal of protecting the residential w <br />52 character of the area. <br />