Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-04-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 09-04-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:12:05 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 4:08:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l ]_ <br />subject of the statement; <br />(3) list of any involved cooperating entities, <br />(4) name, address, and telephone number of the <br />person who can supply further information. <br />(b) Summary. An adequate and accurate summary of the <br />statement stressing the major conclusions, areas <br />of controversy, and issues to be resolved. The <br />summary shall also list all federal, state, and <br />local permits, licenses, certifications, and other <br />approvals which must be obtained in implementing <br />the proposal. If there is any uncertainty about <br />whether any one of these is necessary, it should <br />be so indicated. <br />(c) A completed Environmental Assessment document. <br />(d) Purpose and Need. The underlying purpose and need <br />for the proposed activity. <br />(e) Alternatives including proposed activity. Based <br />upon information and analysis presented in the <br />following sections on the affected environment and <br />environmental consequences, it should present the <br />environmental impacts of the alternatives <br />including the proposed activity in comparative <br />form. To the extent possible the comparison of <br />alternatives should quantify how the purpose and <br />need would be satisfied by each alternative and <br />the proposed activity. It should also: <br />(1) explore and evaluate all reasonable <br />alternatives; <br />(2) discuss the reasons for the elimination of <br />alternatives from detailed study; <br />(3) include appropriate mitigation measures not <br />already included in the alternatives; and <br />(4) describe the environment of the area(s) to be <br />affected and the environment to be created by <br />the alternatives under consideration. The <br />description should be no longer than is <br />necessary to understand the effects of the <br />alternatives. <br />(5) describe environmental consequences, such as; <br />(a) direct effects and significance; <br />(b) indirect effects and significance; <br />(c) possible conflicts between the proposed <br />activities and the objectives of <br />IM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.