Agenda - 09-04-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 (3) whether factors other than market conditions and beyond the control of the subdivider caused a delay in meeting the phasing plan; and (The developer has indicated that he had intended to build the road during the dry weather of the summer. Problems arose in developing a contract for the grading. The developer then attempted to secure a letter of credit, but was unable to complete the process before the time limit expired, due,in part to uncertainty about the estimated grading costs.) (4) whether the development project, if completed consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat, will tend to aid or meet an important public policy goal established by the Board of County Commissioners; and (The subdivision is in conformance with the policies and provisions of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, however, there are no specific public policy goals which would be particularly furthered by this subdivision.) (5) whether the application for an amended phasing plan was submitted before the previously approved time limit(s) has lapsed; and (The developer was notified in June, 1990 that the Preliminary Plat would expire on August 1, 1990. The application for an amended phasing plan was submitted on July 25, 1990 after failure to resolve grading contract issues. Extension of the time limit from August 1, 1990 to December 1, 1990 would allow time to install landscaping improvements during the cooler weather of autumn, and construct or secure construction of the private roads. (6) the possibility of and practicality of the subdivider and developer completing the development project consistent with Orange County regulations applicable if the phasing plan amendment is not granted. (If the phasing plan amendment is not granted, the developer will be required to repeat the Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat approval procedures. Development standards affecting the subdivision have not changed since the preliminary plat was approved.)