Orange County NC Website
T <br />� 1 <br />ORANGE COUNTY 49 <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date August 30 1990 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item # C -3 <br />SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE JOINT PLANNING AGREEMENT <br />...as per the Conceptual Guidelines for the Rural Buffer <br />DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING _X—Yes No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />* - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE <br />JPA AGREEMENT <br />* - EXISTING JPA AGREEMENT TEXT <br />* - STAFF REPORT <br />(See staff report for <br />Conceptual Guidel_ines..., <br />item one of JPA packet) <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Dave Stancil, Extension 2590 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough - 732 -8181 <br />Durham - 688 -7331 <br />Mebane - 227 -2031 <br />Chapel Hill - 967 -9251 <br />PURPOSE: To receive public input on a proposed amendment to the <br />Joint Plannina Agreement for Orange County, Chapel <br />Hill and Carrboro. This amendment is directly related <br />to and contingent upon the previous related items. <br />BACKGROUND: The Rural Character Study Committee's recommended <br />strategy for the Rural Buffer - the Conceptual <br />Guidelines for the Rural Buffer - would also require <br />an amendment to the Joint Plannina Agreement, adopted <br />in November 1987. <br />The proposed Rural Character strategies are consistent <br />with the doctrine of the Joint Plannina Agreement, and <br />require only a change to the "Definition of the Rural <br />Buffer" which is found in Article I, Section 1.2(g). <br />Specifically, the proposed amendment would add <br />language which refers to the creation of five <br />permitted development options with a range of lot <br />sizes and open space set - asides. Language would also <br />be added to qualify the prohibition on public water <br />and sewer service extension to allow an exception for <br />extensions into a predefined service corridor only for <br />the development of planned "Rural Villages ". <br />No other changes to the Agreement are necessary. <br />Because of this item's inter - relatedness to the <br />previous two items, it may be considered as a part of <br />the same hearing. Thus, no separate hearing on this <br />individual item is needed. This item may be <br />