30 Planning August 1990
<br />P L A
<br />3 11
<br />N N I N G N E W S
<br />Help keep us up -to -date. Send newspaper
<br />clippings about significant local planning
<br />issues or brief descriptions of events, con-
<br />troversies, or noticeable trends. Include
<br />names of sources if possible. We'll follow up.
<br />Send to Jim Schwab, Planning, 1313 E. 60th
<br />St., Chicago, IL 60637,
<br />Loudoun County Clears
<br />the Way for Hamlets
<br />Following up on a two - yearlong planning
<br />process, the Loudoun County, Virginia,
<br />board of supervisors in June passed a new
<br />zoning ordinance that encourages
<br />developers to group rural subdivisions in
<br />clustered "hamlets:' The new zoning
<br />allows clusters of five to 25 lots, each as
<br />small as a third of an acre, in districts pre-
<br />viously zoned for three -acre lots.
<br />In exchange for the higher density,
<br />developers must designate 90 percent of
<br />their acreage as permanent open space.
<br />The cluster development harks back to the
<br />area's traditional rural settlements, ac-
<br />cording to county planning coordinator
<br />Richard Calderon, who says it is the first
<br />known use of such zoning in a rural con-
<br />text. See "Repent, Ye Sinners, Repent,"
<br />August 1989.)
<br />When proposed last year, Calderon says,
<br />the idea met considerable support in most
<br />quarters but "uncertainty and doubt" in
<br />the development community. But he says
<br />developers are responding favorably, in-
<br />cluding one who had originally proposed
<br />four- and five -acre lots on about 1,000
<br />acres of land, but recently substituted a
<br />plan conforming to the hamlet design.
<br />In a letter to county planning director
<br />Milton Herd, Miami architect Andres
<br />Duany, who has done site planning for
<br />several Loudoun County developments,
<br />Increased density and an open space buffer
<br />go hand in hand in Loudoun County's new
<br />hamlet zoning.
<br />F
<br />F
<br />c
<br />Christmas trees help to anchor a wetlands resloration project at Lahe Pontchartrain,
<br />of Louisiana's first annual wetlands plan, which focuses heavily on coastal a
<br />praised the ordinance as encouraging an
<br />"ideal pattern of low- density develop-
<br />ment." However, planning consultant
<br />Marc S. Weiss, of Leesburg, president of
<br />the county chapter of the Northern
<br />Virginia Building Industry Association,
<br />says the 400 -foot buffer required around
<br />clustered housing leaves developers too
<br />little flexibility to adapt to the terrain and
<br />find appropriate septic fields, "Developers
<br />support clustering, but the ordinance is
<br />geared more to visually pleasing the peo-
<br />ple passing by than to the people living
<br />there;' Weiss says.
<br />Louisiana Weakens
<br />Wetlands Law
<br />No net loss of wetlands may be national
<br />policy, but in Louisiana, that idea is still
<br />struggling. Bowing to industry and
<br />legislative pressure, the state Wetlands
<br />Conservation and Restoration Authority,
<br />part of Gov. Buddy Roemer's office,
<br />deleted a no net loss provision from the
<br />final version of its first annual wetlands
<br />plan, submitted to the state legislature in
<br />April.
<br />For Louisiana, says Paul Kemp, ex-
<br />ecutive director of the Coalition to Restore
<br />Coastal Louisiana, the problem is serious.
<br />The state, which contains 40 percent of
<br />the nation's coastal wetlands, lost about
<br />40 square miles of them last year, largely
<br />due to development connected with the oil
<br />and gas industry, The state has also lost
<br />large amounts of inland wetlands to
<br />agriculture.
<br />The authority's draft plan, released in
<br />March, listed as a plan objective achiev-
<br />ing "a goal of no net loss of fu ctional
<br />wetland values due to permitted activities
<br />by 1996:' That language ran into a buzz -
<br />saw of opposition from business interests
<br />and the legislature's natural resources
<br />committees, forcing some compromises.
<br />The revised version instead suggests pro-
<br />viding "for replacement of functional
<br />coastal wetland values lost due to future
<br />[permitted] activities."
<br />That language triggered further debate,
<br />and another bill— giving to the state natu-
<br />ral resources department rul making
<br />authority on replacement of coastal wet-
<br />lands— passed in the closing hours of the
<br />session last month. That measure, says
<br />Kemp, may still allow no net loss to be
<br />achieved through the. rulemaking process,
<br />where he predicts "hard battles over the
<br />fine print. We're concentrating now on the
<br />nuts and bolts" of mitigation.
<br />Last fall, state voters approved a referen-
<br />dum allocating 525 - million year] for wet-
<br />lands protection and restoration, with the
<br />money coming from state mineral
<br />revenues. The measure also created the
<br />new coastal authority and required it to
<br />produce an annual wetlands plan to
<br />outline policy and list planned r storation
<br />projects.
<br />.. r±•' s��. ��. 9- �+`' ,;rL.y�.,- :..a% "�3:`s.: *��w`..- - -
<br />.- ., .. .. ....... _. � ice' ^_ ...-
<br />� =,�� -
<br />•�;«.� =.:rte y. ��
<br />Christmas trees help to anchor a wetlands resloration project at Lahe Pontchartrain,
<br />of Louisiana's first annual wetlands plan, which focuses heavily on coastal a
<br />praised the ordinance as encouraging an
<br />"ideal pattern of low- density develop-
<br />ment." However, planning consultant
<br />Marc S. Weiss, of Leesburg, president of
<br />the county chapter of the Northern
<br />Virginia Building Industry Association,
<br />says the 400 -foot buffer required around
<br />clustered housing leaves developers too
<br />little flexibility to adapt to the terrain and
<br />find appropriate septic fields, "Developers
<br />support clustering, but the ordinance is
<br />geared more to visually pleasing the peo-
<br />ple passing by than to the people living
<br />there;' Weiss says.
<br />Louisiana Weakens
<br />Wetlands Law
<br />No net loss of wetlands may be national
<br />policy, but in Louisiana, that idea is still
<br />struggling. Bowing to industry and
<br />legislative pressure, the state Wetlands
<br />Conservation and Restoration Authority,
<br />part of Gov. Buddy Roemer's office,
<br />deleted a no net loss provision from the
<br />final version of its first annual wetlands
<br />plan, submitted to the state legislature in
<br />April.
<br />For Louisiana, says Paul Kemp, ex-
<br />ecutive director of the Coalition to Restore
<br />Coastal Louisiana, the problem is serious.
<br />The state, which contains 40 percent of
<br />the nation's coastal wetlands, lost about
<br />40 square miles of them last year, largely
<br />due to development connected with the oil
<br />and gas industry, The state has also lost
<br />large amounts of inland wetlands to
<br />agriculture.
<br />The authority's draft plan, released in
<br />March, listed as a plan objective achiev-
<br />ing "a goal of no net loss of fu ctional
<br />wetland values due to permitted activities
<br />by 1996:' That language ran into a buzz -
<br />saw of opposition from business interests
<br />and the legislature's natural resources
<br />committees, forcing some compromises.
<br />The revised version instead suggests pro-
<br />viding "for replacement of functional
<br />coastal wetland values lost due to future
<br />[permitted] activities."
<br />That language triggered further debate,
<br />and another bill— giving to the state natu-
<br />ral resources department rul making
<br />authority on replacement of coastal wet-
<br />lands— passed in the closing hours of the
<br />session last month. That measure, says
<br />Kemp, may still allow no net loss to be
<br />achieved through the. rulemaking process,
<br />where he predicts "hard battles over the
<br />fine print. We're concentrating now on the
<br />nuts and bolts" of mitigation.
<br />Last fall, state voters approved a referen-
<br />dum allocating 525 - million year] for wet-
<br />lands protection and restoration, with the
<br />money coming from state mineral
<br />revenues. The measure also created the
<br />new coastal authority and required it to
<br />produce an annual wetlands plan to
<br />outline policy and list planned r storation
<br />projects.
<br />
|