Orange County NC Website
30 Planning August 1990 <br />P L A <br />3 11 <br />N N I N G N E W S <br />Help keep us up -to -date. Send newspaper <br />clippings about significant local planning <br />issues or brief descriptions of events, con- <br />troversies, or noticeable trends. Include <br />names of sources if possible. We'll follow up. <br />Send to Jim Schwab, Planning, 1313 E. 60th <br />St., Chicago, IL 60637, <br />Loudoun County Clears <br />the Way for Hamlets <br />Following up on a two - yearlong planning <br />process, the Loudoun County, Virginia, <br />board of supervisors in June passed a new <br />zoning ordinance that encourages <br />developers to group rural subdivisions in <br />clustered "hamlets:' The new zoning <br />allows clusters of five to 25 lots, each as <br />small as a third of an acre, in districts pre- <br />viously zoned for three -acre lots. <br />In exchange for the higher density, <br />developers must designate 90 percent of <br />their acreage as permanent open space. <br />The cluster development harks back to the <br />area's traditional rural settlements, ac- <br />cording to county planning coordinator <br />Richard Calderon, who says it is the first <br />known use of such zoning in a rural con- <br />text. See "Repent, Ye Sinners, Repent," <br />August 1989.) <br />When proposed last year, Calderon says, <br />the idea met considerable support in most <br />quarters but "uncertainty and doubt" in <br />the development community. But he says <br />developers are responding favorably, in- <br />cluding one who had originally proposed <br />four- and five -acre lots on about 1,000 <br />acres of land, but recently substituted a <br />plan conforming to the hamlet design. <br />In a letter to county planning director <br />Milton Herd, Miami architect Andres <br />Duany, who has done site planning for <br />several Loudoun County developments, <br />Increased density and an open space buffer <br />go hand in hand in Loudoun County's new <br />hamlet zoning. <br />F <br />F <br />c <br />Christmas trees help to anchor a wetlands resloration project at Lahe Pontchartrain, <br />of Louisiana's first annual wetlands plan, which focuses heavily on coastal a <br />praised the ordinance as encouraging an <br />"ideal pattern of low- density develop- <br />ment." However, planning consultant <br />Marc S. Weiss, of Leesburg, president of <br />the county chapter of the Northern <br />Virginia Building Industry Association, <br />says the 400 -foot buffer required around <br />clustered housing leaves developers too <br />little flexibility to adapt to the terrain and <br />find appropriate septic fields, "Developers <br />support clustering, but the ordinance is <br />geared more to visually pleasing the peo- <br />ple passing by than to the people living <br />there;' Weiss says. <br />Louisiana Weakens <br />Wetlands Law <br />No net loss of wetlands may be national <br />policy, but in Louisiana, that idea is still <br />struggling. Bowing to industry and <br />legislative pressure, the state Wetlands <br />Conservation and Restoration Authority, <br />part of Gov. Buddy Roemer's office, <br />deleted a no net loss provision from the <br />final version of its first annual wetlands <br />plan, submitted to the state legislature in <br />April. <br />For Louisiana, says Paul Kemp, ex- <br />ecutive director of the Coalition to Restore <br />Coastal Louisiana, the problem is serious. <br />The state, which contains 40 percent of <br />the nation's coastal wetlands, lost about <br />40 square miles of them last year, largely <br />due to development connected with the oil <br />and gas industry, The state has also lost <br />large amounts of inland wetlands to <br />agriculture. <br />The authority's draft plan, released in <br />March, listed as a plan objective achiev- <br />ing "a goal of no net loss of fu ctional <br />wetland values due to permitted activities <br />by 1996:' That language ran into a buzz - <br />saw of opposition from business interests <br />and the legislature's natural resources <br />committees, forcing some compromises. <br />The revised version instead suggests pro- <br />viding "for replacement of functional <br />coastal wetland values lost due to future <br />[permitted] activities." <br />That language triggered further debate, <br />and another bill— giving to the state natu- <br />ral resources department rul making <br />authority on replacement of coastal wet- <br />lands— passed in the closing hours of the <br />session last month. That measure, says <br />Kemp, may still allow no net loss to be <br />achieved through the. rulemaking process, <br />where he predicts "hard battles over the <br />fine print. We're concentrating now on the <br />nuts and bolts" of mitigation. <br />Last fall, state voters approved a referen- <br />dum allocating 525 - million year] for wet- <br />lands protection and restoration, with the <br />money coming from state mineral <br />revenues. The measure also created the <br />new coastal authority and required it to <br />produce an annual wetlands plan to <br />outline policy and list planned r storation <br />projects. <br />.. r±•' s��. ��. 9- �+`' ,;rL.y�.,- :..a% "�3:`s.: *��w`..- - - <br />.- ., .. .. ....... _. � ice' ^_ ...- <br />� =,�� - <br />•�;«.� =.:rte y. �� <br />Christmas trees help to anchor a wetlands resloration project at Lahe Pontchartrain, <br />of Louisiana's first annual wetlands plan, which focuses heavily on coastal a <br />praised the ordinance as encouraging an <br />"ideal pattern of low- density develop- <br />ment." However, planning consultant <br />Marc S. Weiss, of Leesburg, president of <br />the county chapter of the Northern <br />Virginia Building Industry Association, <br />says the 400 -foot buffer required around <br />clustered housing leaves developers too <br />little flexibility to adapt to the terrain and <br />find appropriate septic fields, "Developers <br />support clustering, but the ordinance is <br />geared more to visually pleasing the peo- <br />ple passing by than to the people living <br />there;' Weiss says. <br />Louisiana Weakens <br />Wetlands Law <br />No net loss of wetlands may be national <br />policy, but in Louisiana, that idea is still <br />struggling. Bowing to industry and <br />legislative pressure, the state Wetlands <br />Conservation and Restoration Authority, <br />part of Gov. Buddy Roemer's office, <br />deleted a no net loss provision from the <br />final version of its first annual wetlands <br />plan, submitted to the state legislature in <br />April. <br />For Louisiana, says Paul Kemp, ex- <br />ecutive director of the Coalition to Restore <br />Coastal Louisiana, the problem is serious. <br />The state, which contains 40 percent of <br />the nation's coastal wetlands, lost about <br />40 square miles of them last year, largely <br />due to development connected with the oil <br />and gas industry, The state has also lost <br />large amounts of inland wetlands to <br />agriculture. <br />The authority's draft plan, released in <br />March, listed as a plan objective achiev- <br />ing "a goal of no net loss of fu ctional <br />wetland values due to permitted activities <br />by 1996:' That language ran into a buzz - <br />saw of opposition from business interests <br />and the legislature's natural resources <br />committees, forcing some compromises. <br />The revised version instead suggests pro- <br />viding "for replacement of functional <br />coastal wetland values lost due to future <br />[permitted] activities." <br />That language triggered further debate, <br />and another bill— giving to the state natu- <br />ral resources department rul making <br />authority on replacement of coastal wet- <br />lands— passed in the closing hours of the <br />session last month. That measure, says <br />Kemp, may still allow no net loss to be <br />achieved through the. rulemaking process, <br />where he predicts "hard battles over the <br />fine print. We're concentrating now on the <br />nuts and bolts" of mitigation. <br />Last fall, state voters approved a referen- <br />dum allocating 525 - million year] for wet- <br />lands protection and restoration, with the <br />money coming from state mineral <br />revenues. The measure also created the <br />new coastal authority and required it to <br />produce an annual wetlands plan to <br />outline policy and list planned r storation <br />projects. <br />