Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-30-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 08-30-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:14:59 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 4:07:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/30/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2S r <br />2. OVERALL MINIMUM LOT SIZE BASIS (CH, CA) <br />The Rural Character Study Committee has proposed that the overall <br />minimum lot size calculations for developments in the Rural Buffer <br />revert back to a "80,000 square footage" (1.84 acres) base rather <br />than the current "2.0- acre" base. <br />In 1987, when Rural Buffer zoning was implemented, a minimum lot <br />size of 2.0 acres was instituted - replacing the previous County <br />standard of 0.92 acres (40,000 square feet). The latter County <br />standard is still applied in the rural parts of the County and <br />stems from the minimum lot area needed for septic tank permits. <br />This base of 40,000 square feet is also used in the lower density <br />Water Quality Critical Area, which has a. minimum lot size of 80,000 <br />square feet (1.84 acres) rather than 2.0 acres. <br />There appear to be arguments in both directions. The acreage -based <br />standard is consistent with the Joint Planning Agreement and Land <br />Use Plan. The square - footage base is consistent with all Orange <br />County residential options outside of the Rural Buffer. <br />The concern of Chapel Hill and Carrboro staff is that reducing the <br />minimum lot size from 2.0 acres to 1.84 acres will result in a <br />greater number of dwellings in the Rural Buffer than was envisioned <br />by the Joint Planning-Agreement and Land Use Plan. <br />Orange County staff feels the increase that might be seen in number <br />of dwellings is.very slight, and that any increase would be offset <br />by the flexibility granted - yielding more sensitive site design. <br />3. MINIMUM LOT SIZE VERSUS AVERAGE LOT SIZE (CH) <br />The Rural Character Study Committee has recommended allowing the <br />use of "average" lot sizing rather than "minimum" lot sizing for <br />non - sewered residential' developments in the Rural Buffer. The <br />purpose for this provision is to allow additional design <br />flexibility for property owners and developers in producing site - <br />sensitive developments. <br />For example, a 50 -acre tract of land with moderately -good soils <br />currently could be subdivided into 20 -22 single - family dwelling <br />lots of 2.0 acres each. A 50 -acre tract with worse soil conditions <br />would likely contain fewer lots. <br />Under the proposed "averaging" provision, the property owner would <br />be allowed the flexibility to create a certain number of lots less <br />than 2.0 acres in size (but larger than 40,000 square feet), only <br />if these smaller lots were balanced with lots that were <br />respectively larger. Thus, the property owner might create 11 one- - <br />acre lots and 11 three -acre lots - using the better soils for the <br />smaller lots and the poorer soils for the larger lots, and fitting <br />the lot lines to the tract with some flexibility. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.