Orange County NC Website
recognize the concerns that the Committee were trying <br />to address and would pledge to pursue other methods and <br />means of achieving that goal. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF EACH JURISDICTION <br />CHAPEL HILL PLANNING STAFF <br />The Chapel Hill Planning Staff recommends conditional <br />approval of the Rural Buffer strategies as outlined in the staff <br />report. The staff recommends against specific provisions that would <br />allow public sewer extension to rural villages, square-footage minimum <br />lot size, average lot size flexibility and two one -acre lots per 1987 <br />lot -of- record. In addition, the Chapel Hill staff further recommends <br />that, as proposed in the Town Council's public hearing resolutions, a <br />Joint Work Grou be appointed to further discuss the policy issues of <br />the proposals. It is recommended that this Joint Work Group consist <br />of elected officials from each jurisdiction, a representative from <br />OWASA, and a representative from the Rural Character Study Committee. <br />The Chapel Hill staff also recommends that the proposed amendments to <br />the Joint Plannin Area Land Use Plan and Agreement be deferred <br />pending conclusion of discussion by the Joint Work Group. <br />CARRBORO PLANNING STAFF <br />The Carrboro Planning Staff recommends endorsement of the <br />Conceptual Guidelines for the Rural Buffer with two exceptions. <br />First, that the provision calling for reintroduction of lot sizes <br />based on square footage not be pursued, and second that the <br />proposed allowance of two one -acre lots per 1987 lot of record <br />also not be pursued. The Carrboro staff recommends approval of <br />those amendments to the Joint Plannin Area Land Use Plan and <br />Agreement that do not conflict with these exceptions. The <br />Carrboro staff does not recommend the establishment of a joint <br />work group unless said group was very narrowly focused, had a <br />deadline for resolution and did not duplicate the efforts of the <br />Rural Character Study Committee. <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />The Orange County staff recommends endorsement of the <br />strategies contained in the Conceptual Guidelines with the sole <br />exception being the provision of two one -acre lots for each 1987 <br />lot -of- record. They recommend approval of the proposed Joint <br />Planning Area Land Use Plan and A reement amendments. In regard <br />to the Joint Work Group, the staff recommends against the <br />establishment of such a group. However, if such a work group is <br />desired, County Staff would recommend a limited scope of review <br />to issues, specified timeframe and the appointment of two members <br />of the Rural Character Study Committee to insure continuity. <br />UESTIONS COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BOARDS <br />MAYOR ELEANOR RINNAIRD questioned if an option is chosen for the <br />large acreage of land which is setaside, how can the land be <br />guaranteed to be setaside forever. David Stancil indicated this would <br />be a condition of final plat approval. <br />COUNCIL MEMBER JULIE ANDRESEN asked what assurances would be made <br />