Orange County NC Website
David Stancil concluded the slide presentation by stating that <br />the Rural Character Study Committee has attempted to propose a package <br />that recognizes both resource protection and private property rights <br />for what they are, and identified a first step toward peaceful <br />coexistence of these two land concepts as Orange County approaches the <br />21st Century. . <br />STAFFS RECOMMENDATIONS <br />All three staffs are in consensus on the positive aspects of the <br />concepts that have been identified by the study committee in their <br />strategy. In the agenda is a joint staff report. Four areas have <br />been identified as concerns by the governing boards: <br />(1) EXTENSION OF PUBLIC SEWER TO RURAL VILLAGES <br />Currently water and sewer is not present in the buffer. <br />By extending water and sewer into these areas, <br />development may be encouraged at densities in the <br />future beyond those seen in the Joint Land Use Plan. <br />The study committee has recommended that these lines be <br />designed to service these villages only. <br />(2) OVERALL MINIMUM LOT SIZE BASIS <br />The Rural Character Study Committee proposed that the <br />overall minimum lot size calculations for developments <br />in the RB revert back to a 1180,000 square footage" base <br />rather than the current 112.0- acre" base. The concern <br />of Chapel Hill and Carrboro staff is that reducing the <br />minimum lot size from 2.0 acres to 1.84 acres will <br />result in a greater number of dwellings in the Rural <br />Buffer than was envisioned by the Joint Planning <br />Agreement and Land Use Plan. Orange County staff feels <br />the increase that might be seen in number of dwellings <br />is very slight, and that any increase would be offset <br />by the flexibility granted - yielding more sensitive <br />site design. <br />(3) MINIMUM LOT SIZE VERSUS AVERAGE LOT SIZE <br />The Rural Character Study Committee has recommended <br />allowing the use of "average" lot sizing rather than <br />"minimum" lot sizing for non - sewered residential <br />developments in the Rural Buffer. The Chapel Hill <br />staff is concerned that this flexibility would be <br />achieved at the expense of increased densities and <br />number of dwellings over what was envisioned in the <br />Joint Planning Agent and Joint Planning Area Land <br />Use Plan. The position of Orange County and Carrboro <br />staffs is that the increase that might be seen in <br />number of dwellings is very slight and that any <br />increase would be offset by the flexibility granted - <br />yielding a more sensitive site design. <br />(4) ONE -ACRE LOTS FOR EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD <br />The Study Committee proposed to allow 2 1 -acre lots for <br />each 1987 lot of record. All three of the planning <br />staffs agree that the allowance of all such tracts to <br />create two one -acre lots might be damaging to the <br />concept and function of the Rural Buffer. The staffs <br />