Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-30-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 08-30-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:14:59 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 4:07:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/30/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Growth _Management <br />The Rural Buffer, as a part of the Joint Planning Area Land <br />Use Plan for Orange County, Chapel Hill and Carrboro plays a <br />critical growth management role for the future of both the <br />, <br />County and the Towns. Its purpose as a rural greenbelt <br />separating the urbanized areas from other suburban and urban <br />areas is very clearly stated in the Joint Land Use Plan. <br />Therefore the Committee recognized very early that whatever <br />strategy they recommended for preserving the rural character <br />in thel�uffer must also complement and maintain the integrity <br />of this vital growth management tool as defined in the Land <br />Use Plan. <br />In examining the New Hope portion of the buffer in detail, <br />the committee asked itself two important questions re the <br />rural buffer. <br />1. Is the current development standard of single - <br />family residential lots of at least 2.0 acres <br />fostering the protection of the buffer's <br />rural character? <br />2. Is that rural buffer development standard helping to <br />preserve open space and resources? <br />After considerable study and discussion the answers to <br />these questions were determined to be NO on the first <br />count and "not necessarily" on the second. <br />In a very real sense, the rural character of the buffer is <br />becoming eroded by the plethora of cookie - cutter two -acre <br />subdivisions. While this does promote a low- density of <br />development it alsoapromotes a "rural sprawl" that the <br />current standard actually encourages. The Committee found <br />that a rural buffer consisting of a linear two -acre lot <br />subdivision is not rural at all. <br />Nor are there incentives or reasons for developers to <br />protect resources. Although the buffer contains vital <br />natural and visual resources, there is currently no package <br />that encoura es the preservation of these resources beyond <br />the good wilFof the developer. <br />Isn't there a way to encourage clustered developments that <br />discourage rural sprawl, are low density, and yet protect and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.