Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-30-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 08-30-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:14:59 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 4:07:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/30/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q 2v <br />SLIDE PRESENTATION <br />When the Rural Character Study Committee began deliberations <br />on a set of strategies to reserve the rural character of the <br />Rural Buffer ' , the Committee began by <br />considering its four goals: <br />Agricultural Preservation <br />Natural Resource Protection <br />Visual Resource Protection <br />Growth Management. <br />and a fifth unwritten goal of _providing rural buffer E roperty <br />owners with more flexibility <br />In considering these ggoats, the Committee realizes that each <br />plays a special and vital role in the Rural Buffer portion of <br />the County. <br />In their product, the Conceptual Guidelines for the Rural <br />Buffer, each goal is addressed of individually an <br />comprehensively. <br />Agricultural Preservation <br />The New Hope Creek portion of the Rural Buffer, in the 30 <br />years since 1960, has lost over 50% of its land used for <br />i <br />agriculture. This s a trend that is widely seen in our <br />region and state. Nonetheless, agriculture remains a integral <br />part of the character and resources of the buffer. Are there <br />ways of helping to ensure that agriculture will continue to <br />be a part of the Rural Buffer in the decades to come? <br />In discussing this question with farmers and other interested <br />Vio arties, it became clear to the committee that the best way <br />enhance the viability of agriculture is to make strategies <br />for agricultural preservation an integrahpart of the totar <br />strategy - not a separate issue. The Committee learned <br />that many farmers were concerned that making a livingg in <br />agriculture was becoming more difficult, but that they ad an <br />equal concern over a potential loss in their lifelon <br />investment - the land itself - since this land is of en the <br />farmers retirement and pension. <br />Therefore, the Committee has adopted strategies that would <br />encourage agriculture to coexist with future development - <br />through allowing agriculture in open space set - asides. This <br />means that a farmer who is faced with financial straits need <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.