Agenda - 08-21-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1) 7 Meisner expressed agreement with the majority of the responses as prepared and presented by Collins. MOTION: Cantrell moved approval with the changes as follows: 1) To delete the AM and PM peak hours; 2) To change the trip generation chart to reflect the actual trips generated; and 3) To maintain the general exemption under Section 13.3 of the existing ordinance; and 4) Underline the word may in 13.5.c.2. Seconded by Eddleman. Cantrell expressed concern that the Planning Board be perceived as being friendly to Economic Development. VOTE: 5 in favor. 2 opposed (Reid - noted he did not fully understand why the caps were placed where they are; Waddell - felt the caps are too low and have not specifically described ground where TIS would be required and felt it was not conducive to economic development. c. Private Roads (1) Sections IV /V - Subdivision Regulations (2) Private Road Standards Presentation by Gene Bell. Proposed amendments to Private Road Standards were proposed as an outgrowth of a meeting involving the County Attorney and the Planning Board several years ago. He indicated that revisions to private roads policy and standards clarifying appropriateness and maintenance responsibility were needed. The TAS spent considerable time discussing the subject and working with the consultant on it. Major features of the proposed revisions to the Subdivision Regulations and Private Road Standards include: 1) Coordination of private roads with the public road system; 2) Clarification as to where public roads will be required; 3) Clarification as to where private roads are appropriate;