Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-06-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 08-06-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:21:15 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 4:05:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/6/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
704
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1) <br />2) <br />3) <br />P.DOPTBD 12 <br />31290 <br />PART FOUR - POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The Committee finds that the University Lake watershed <br />portion of the current Rural Buffer fer has characteristics <br />and growth management functions <br />from the r em' of the Rural Buffer. The Committee <br />therefore recommends that t e LIn'versit�rLnr,GPda"Rural <br />4a,v — <br />De exal�L - - - <br />�oundary" district, and that it be coassubsecuentnphase <br />other water supply watersheds during <br />of the Rural Character Study. <br />The Committee further recommends that <br />appforr�efbY both <br />urC ase f Deve o ment R chts be <br />the Towns and County. One recommended use of -such aw the <br />system would be in water <br />supply , <br />users of water supplies as compensate in <br />the watershed for any la <br />value from more restriststemscouldralso than <br />be anthose <br />effective <br />proposed here. Such a y <br />means of protecting sites listed on the Inventory of <br />t <br />Naura Areas and W ldlife Habitats of Orance County. <br />The Committee endorses an expedited planning review <br />process for "Minor Subdivisions ". For the purposes of <br />this document, "Minor Subdivisions" shall be construed <br />to mean: <br />a) the subdivision of land into not more than four (4) <br />single family building lots; <br />OR <br />x land into single-family building <br />b) the subdivision o <br />lo-:.s such that the average lot size of the <br />subdivision is greater than_4.59 acres- <br />incentives <br />4) The Corm -ittce recommends t;at a system oZ inot�ion 3, <br />for larger 1Gt.,. developments, as outlined in <br />should include private roads and an expedited planning <br />review process. <br />}� finds owth management concerns <br />5) The Commie -ee - nds that gr <br />over the extension of arateswpe' fitted vciah ;ne -he- . <br />through the proposed density <br />district. In this way, the Rural Boundary plan would <br />drive water and 'sewer extension., and not vice versa. <br />5) Uses (such as Churches and schools) that are currently I <br />r zonin i ct would <br />permitted in the Rural'Buffe_ g oBaunda-y district. <br />continue to be permitted in the Rural <br />rb312f in.doc \31290pds <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.