Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ADOPTED 10 <br />31290 <br />c, neon E developments should be located within one <br />mile of arterial or collector roadways for traffic <br />management reasons. Such developments should not be <br />located directly on intersections, and should be <br />buffered from roadways. <br />d. Use of t a sf rred deve o meat i hts from within the <br />jr-1 <br />Rural Boundary district would be required in order to <br />create an Option E' development. Development rights <br />would be equal to the density in excess of one <br />dwelling unit per acre. <br />e, In conjunction with the above, the Committee should <br />analyze and define a "Development. Sector" for Option <br />I developments, which would factor in the location of <br />arterial and collector roadways and feasible public <br />utility extension to create a logical, cost - effective <br />and east, whexe1suchcdevelopmentsthe <br />wouldRural <br />be $encouraged. <br />district. <br />f. 0 t�ion E, as a self - contained community, should <br />allow a commercial /institutional core to be designed <br />at a village level. This should include a road <br />network designed to protect the rural character and <br />discourage passer-by-commercial activity. <br />4) The Committee finds that the Option D (Planned) option <br />may also require some form of sewer system. <br />The Committee recommends that Ong D developments <br />utilize public water and sewer where available. Where <br />public water and sewer extension is not cost effective, <br />the use of community alternative sewer systems would be <br />permitted. The use of these community systems would be <br />contingent on participation in a Mon'tor�na a ^'d <br />msintenance program adopted by the County, and such <br />t e <br />systems shotld be built to nubl�c specificatie s so that <br />they might bpaIncorporated into a public Sys <br />m in time. <br />5) For Ontio B, the maximum tract size for development with <br />"Minor Subdivision" review incentives would be 200 acres. <br />Option B subdivisions of greater than 200 acres in size <br />would be permitted in accordance with the provisions of <br />"Major-Subdivisions". <br />PART TWO - PROPOSED LOT SIZE AND OPEN SPACE <br />The Committee recommends the following standards for the five <br />development categories: <br />