Agenda - 08-06-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ADOPTED 31290- 9 CONCEPTUAL GUIDELINES FOR THE RURAL BOUNDARY PORTION OF THE RURAL CHARACTER STUDY Adopted by the Rural Character Study Committee March 12, 1990 PART ONE - DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS 1) The Committee finds that five development categories should be permitted within the Rural Boundary district, as defined on the attached map, and in Parts Two and . Four. These categories or options, followed by a brief description, are as follows: OPTION A. Allows for two -acre lot developments, as is permitted presently in Rural Buffer. Resources protected as'in present manner. OPTION B. Allows for five -acre lot developments, treated as Minor Subdivisions, with an expedited and simplified subdivision review process (staff approval), private roads, and lower fees as incentives. Resources protected as in present manner. OPTION C. Allows for clustered 1 -acre lot developments with 40% open space. OPTION D. Allows for a planned developments with a density of 0.72 (72 units per 100 acres) and 67% open space. OPTION E. Allows for development of a Rural Village, with a density of 0.84 (84 units per 100 acres), 80% open space and minimum,of 200 acres in size. Use of transferred develo meet rights would_ be required in order to utilize tb.is o R tion . e� 2) The Committee recommends that four of these five development actions be a matter of right for the property owner. Option E would be allowed as per item 3) below: ' 3) The Committee finds that Option E is significantly different from the other options, and should therefore be permitted with the following conditions: a. There should be a minimum tract size of 200 acres. b. Public water and sewer extension should be required for Option E developments. Such lines should be adequately sized and limited to serve the village only. 1