Orange County NC Website
(0 /1 �; /CIO <br />' I�Ic�nn►n� l`�jc1 <br />VY\ ►nv4eS <br />Cd ru +) <br />4 <br />Best asked for more explanation of how <br />the combination or recombination of non- <br />conforming lots could become exempt. Scearbo <br />responded that the most common non - <br />conformities are lot size and lot width. <br />Scearbo continued that this amendment would <br />clarify the standards to say that we will <br />deem a lot to be consistent with the <br />standards of the ordinance as long as there <br />are no.new.non- conforming aspects created. <br />(b) Section II Minor Subdivision <br />(2) Appeal Procedures <br />(a) Section III -C -5 Minor Subdivision <br />(b) Section III -D -1 Concept Plan /Major <br />Subdivision <br />(c) Section III -D -4 Final Plat /Major <br />Subdivision <br />(3).Flag Lots <br />(a) Section IV -B -S -d Road Access /Extension <br />(4) Street Access /Dedication <br />(a) Section IV -B -3 Streets <br />(b) Section V -D -6 -b Certificates of <br />Dedication & Maintenance <br />(5) Concept Plan - Minor Subdivisions <br />(a) Section.III -C -1 Concept Plan Approval <br />MOTION: Lewis moved approval of the proposed amendments <br />included in Agenda Item #10b. Seconded by <br />Eddleman. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />Eddleman asked the status of the Environmental <br />Impact Ordinance. Scearbo responded that it will <br />be presented at the July 10 Long Range meeting. <br />AGENDA ITEM #11: MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING (6/27/90) <br />a. Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan <br />(1) LUP- -4--90 Conceptual Strategies for the <br />