Agenda - 06-04-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERTAINING TO APPLICATION: Z -8-89 ENVIROTE , INC. BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIAL SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION /REZONING ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION /REZONING ( "1'es" indicates compliance_ "No" indicates Non -com lip �ance PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS BASED BOARD OF ON SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements The application must comply with all requirements specified in Article 20 - Amendments. Those requirements include: 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected `x,Yes No The property is shown on tax map at a Yes No property at scale of not less scale of 1" =400'. This scale is found than 1" =100' nor more than by staff to be appropriate due to the 1" =20' size of the property. 20.3.2 b) Legal description _x—Yes No Description provided with application Yes No of property 20.3.2 c) Explanation of Yes _x_NO The applicant alleges that the existing alleged error, if any, to be ordinance is in error due to: corrected by proposed amendment 1) faiture to recognize impacts of I -40 on adjacent properties 2) lack of provision for a variety of residential support services 3) inappropriateness of a density of .5 units /acre in areas adjacent to I-40, and lack of flexibility in use to provide a transition between 1-40 and residential uses. Planning Staff finds no error in existing ordinance provision because: 1) the completion of I-40 through the Rural Buffer was anticipated when the Rural Buffer was adopted, 2) residential services are provided within an acceptabLe radius, 3) a buffer sufficient to protect residential development from impacts of I -40 can be incorporated into subdivision design. * Yes No 14