Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-04-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 06-04-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 12:39:38 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 12:29:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/4/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b I � V <br />M. <br />memorandum which compared Habitat's request with <br />the criteria for granting a phasing plan <br />amendment which must be considered by the Board <br />of County Commissioners. It is up to the <br />applicant to propose a phasing plan that they <br />feel can be implemented and then, based on those <br />criteria in the ordinance, the Commissioners have <br />to make a decision whether or not to grant the <br />amendment to the phasing plan. The Commissioners <br />do have the option to attach additional <br />reasonable conditions in an effort to make sure <br />the amended phasing plan is implemented. <br />Hamilton stated that she felt there is a distinct <br />difference between Habitat and a private <br />developer. A private developer is making a <br />living and Habitat is a non - profit project. She <br />continued that she felt that was sufficient <br />difference to warrant the amendment to the <br />phasing plan and to allow private rather than <br />public roads. <br />Lewis noted again that he wished he could say <br />that Habitat is special and it makes sense.to <br />allow the private road. He continued, that as a <br />representative on the Planning Board of the <br />development community, he felt that it would be <br />grossly unfair to do so. <br />Reid indicated agreement with comments by <br />Cantrell and noted he had worked with Habitat in <br />Greensboro through the Naval Reserve. He <br />continued that Habitat is indeed different and <br />agreed that they should be allowed to have a <br />private road rather than a public road. The cost <br />of the road for a developer and Habitat is <br />different in that the homebuyer of a Habitat <br />house could not afford the $3,300 cost of paving <br />the road, whereas, a developer would simply add <br />that to the cost of his lot and house; in which <br />case the buyer would have options, but Habitat <br />would not. <br />Waddell asked why a paved road was initially <br />chosen for this property rather than a gravel <br />road. Was it a requirement? Does public mean <br />paved? Eidenier responded that in Orange <br />County all new public roads must be paved. <br />That regulation became effective 1967. Waddell <br />continued asking why a public road rather than a <br />private road was required. Crudup responded that <br />staff felt a public road would better serve the <br />residents of the subdivision due to the number of <br />lots and the amount of traffic. At that time, no <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.