Orange County NC Website
VA <br />Chestnut Oaks Phasing <br />page two <br />Unfortunately, the increase in Habitat's organizational capacity <br />has not occurred quickly enough to keep pace with the Phase <br />expiration dates of the Chestnut Oaks Preliminary Plat. <br />Additionally, the rapid growth of Habitat has meant that attention <br />and emphasis has been focused within the organization itself, its <br />family selection process and fund raising for homes. As Habitat grew <br />and conquered its own internal obstacles, they remained unaware of <br />the importance of time in Chestnut Oaks. <br />The organization growth process unique to this non - profit is <br />responsible for our failure to conform to our Phase dates. Market <br />conditions have not affected our work in Chestnut Oaks. <br />4. "Whether the development project, if completed consistent <br />with the approved Preliminary Plat, will tend to aid or <br />meet an important public policy goal established by the <br />Board of County Commissioners" <br />Habitat for Humanity provides excellent homeownership <br />opportunities to families earning 30% and less of our areas median <br />income. In doing so, Habitat meets an important public policy goal <br />established by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />5. "Whether the application for an amended phasing plan was <br />submitted before the previously approved time limit(s) has <br />lapsed" <br />The application for an amended Phasing plan was not submitted <br />before the previously approved time limit had lapsed. <br />6. "The possibility of and practicality of the subdivider and <br />developer completing the development project consistent <br />with Orange County regulations applicable if the phasing <br />plan amendment is not granted" <br />If this application is not granted, the extant Preliminary Plat <br />for Chestnut Oaks will completely expire. Regulations passed by the <br />County on April 2 of this year would apply to any new Plat <br />application. Those regulations would decrease the number of <br />potential lots to one -third the current approved number. An <br />irreplaceable opportunity for decent low income housing would be <br />lost. <br />