Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-15-1990 (2)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 05-15-1990 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 12:27:48 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 12:13:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/15/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O RANGE C O U N T Y <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date May 16, 1990 <br />75 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item # 3. aA b. <br />SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS <br />AND ORANGE COUNTY PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS <br />DEPARTMENT: PLANNING <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />- Proposed Amendments to Orange <br />County Subdivision Regulations <br />- Proposed Amendments to Orange <br />County Private Road Standards <br />PUBLIC HEARING _ x Yes NO <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Bell <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough - 732 -8181 <br />Durham - 688 -7331 <br />Mebane - 227 -2031 <br />Chapel Hill - 967 -9251 <br />PURPOSE: To receive citizen comment on proposed amendments to <br />the Orange County Subdivision Regulations and Orange <br />County Private Road Standards related to private roads <br />policy and standards. <br />BACKGROUND: On July 20, 1987 the County Attorney addressed the <br />Planning Board on the history of private roads in <br />Orange County. He indicated that County policy <br />regarding subdivision roads was that they be public <br />unless the subdivider presented evidence to the <br />contrary as to why private roads were more <br />appropriate. He further stated that once a private <br />road was completed and the property owners had assumed <br />maintenance responsibility, the County had no further <br />role unless upgrading of the road was necessary due to <br />subsequent development. <br />The County Attorney did cite cases where property <br />owners were unwilling to abide by their contractual <br />obligations regarding road maintenance or where <br />subsequent purchasers of property on a private road <br />were unaware of their obligations. Both of these <br />situations often resulted in disgruntled property <br />owners contacting Orange County for resolution of <br />their problems. The County Attorney indicated <br />revisions to private roads policy and standards <br />clarifying appropriateness and maintenance <br />responsibility were needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.