Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-15-1990 (2)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 05-15-1990 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 12:27:48 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 12:13:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/15/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Halkiotis to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation <br />to come back to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 6, <br />1990. VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />3. PRIVATE ROADS <br />a. Section IV and V Orange County Subdivision Regulations <br />b. Orange county Private Road Standards <br />These proposed amendments to the Orange County Subdivision <br />Regulations and the Orange County Private Road Standards relate to the <br />private roads policy and standards. Major features of the proposed <br />revisions to the Subdivision Regulations and Private Road Standards <br />include: <br />1) coordination of private roads with the public road system; <br />2) clarification as to where public roads will be required; <br />3) clarification as to where private roads are appropriate; <br />4) additional certification on final plats regarding access, future <br />development, and disclosure to prospective purchasers; <br />5) a cap on the number of lots /dwellings that can be served by a <br />Class <br />A private road; <br />6) transfer of inspection and certification responsibility from the <br />County to professional engineers and /or registered land <br />surveyors; and <br />7) a reduction in the maximum grade allowed on a private road. <br />ALICE GORDON referred to the implication of "existing road" in the <br />ordinance and in particular as this would apply to a person who has a <br />two acre lot and wants to divide it into two one acre lots. She feels <br />this would be a burden on that landowner to upgrade the road. <br />JAY ZARAGOZA referred to the 12% grade and sees this as excessively <br />restrictive. He referred to the road maintenance agreement and stated <br />that while it is possible to get twenty --five people to agree to <br />something it is another thing to get them to do what they have agreed to <br />do. <br />Mr. Meisner state, <br />roads as well as the <br />private road that is <br />create more traffic. <br />improved to at least <br />number of units. <br />3 that the purpose was to look at the new private <br />existing ones to be sure there is not a small <br />twelve feet wide where additional development could <br />The assumption would be that the road would be <br />the minimum standard that would be required by that <br />William Waddell asked about the existing roads that do not meet this <br />criteria and asked if another road would need to be built if additional <br />development takes place. Mr. Meisner stated this will be taken into <br />account when considering the final recommendation. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation <br />to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 6, <br />1990. VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.