Orange County NC Website
N <br />24 <br />future development of an equivalent <br />number of affordable units. <br />3) A 50% density increase may if all of the <br />lots /units are reserved for qualifying <br />households. <br />Occupancy would be restricted by a contractural <br />agreement with the Orange County Department of <br />Housing and Community Development, and should be <br />binding for at least 15 years. <br />The proposal was first presented for public <br />hearing August 28, 1989. The initial proposal <br />was revised based on comments received, and was <br />again presented for public hearing on February <br />26, 1990. Comments at the public hearing focused <br />on how the provisions would be administered. <br />Those comments are discussed in the "Proposed <br />Amendment" which is an attachment to these <br />minutes on pages <br />A copy of the analysis from HUD which calculates <br />the level of income to qualify for affordable <br />housing is an attachment to these minutes on <br />pages Scearbo indicated this would be the <br />model Orange County would use to determine <br />qualification for affordable housing. <br />Scearbo reviewed the proposed amendment and <br />questions received at the public hearing. <br />In answer to a question regarding selling price, <br />Scearbo reviewed the method used for calculation. <br />She noted that she could have HUD run a model for <br />Orange County with specifics for a sample family <br />prior to the public hearing. She indicated that <br />the most critical factor will be determining <br />median income. <br />Waddell expressed concern that the buyer would <br />not benefit from increased value due to <br />improvements. Reid expressed the same concern <br />that it seemed the buyer would have to remain the <br />entire fifteen years to realize those benefits. <br />Scearbo responded the target group is one that <br />would not be able to purchase a home at all <br />without such a program. She continued that this <br />effort will by no means solve the affordable <br />housing dilemna; it is one area where the Count <br />can provide some opportunities for home <br />ownership. <br />Waddell also expressed concern with the <br />