Orange County NC Website
PAGE 4 <br />WHEREAS, the County of orange and the Town of Hillsborough <br />have previously and jointly indicated to the Division of <br />Environmental Management a desire and a determination to seek <br />additional protection of water quality in the Seven Mile <br />Creek watershed; and, <br />WHEREAS, the existing watershed classification for the Seven <br />Mile Creek basin is WS -III, the classification which would <br />provide the lowest level of water supply protection; and, <br />WHEREAS, the existing water quality, waste treatment <br />discharge status, and local regulatory protection measures <br />would be sufficient to qualify the Seven Mile Creek watershed <br />for the protection status of a WS -I Classification, as it is <br />presently defined, and which is the most protective watershed <br />classification existing under the current classification <br />system; and, <br />WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of <br />Orange is interested in providing the highest level of <br />protection possible for the Seven Mile Creek watershed; <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The County of Orange <br />hereby requests that the Division of Environmental <br />Management upgrade the classification of the Seven Male Creek <br />watershed to a WS -I classification. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />VIII. PUBLIC HEARING <br />A. Z -2 -90 ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT ELITE AUTO BODY <br />SHOP <br />Planner Emily Crudup explained that this public <br />hearing is for the purpose of correcting an error in the <br />Zoning Atlas by shifting the EC -5 district west to its proper <br />location and out of the right -of -way, and to extend the <br />district three (3) feet to the north so that the structure <br />and a proposed addition will meet required setbacks. The <br />property is located on the north side of old Greensboro Road <br />approximately one half mile east of White Cross Road. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Mr. Wayne P. Hoffman asked that the EC -5 zoning be <br />extended to include his business sign so he would not have to <br />move the sign which has been there since 1978. He contended <br />that if the sign was moved into the zoned portion, the sign <br />would not be large enough to be read at a distance. <br />Victor Tripp spoke in support of this rezoning <br />request. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded <br />by Commissioner Marshall to close the public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />