Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21. <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />question is can a positive, corporate culture be created within the walls of the schoc <br />Achievement for all students is the goal of this bill. Normally the greater succes <br />in schools can be tracked along racial and /or economic lines. This bill attempts <br />create a better, more professional work environment for those who try to educate childr <br />Flexible funding is another option in the bill. Local goals will be set by each sys <br />and then by each school in the system. Student achievement is the criteria here and <br />needs to be improved through the new goals set. <br />Each school system decided which options to use. If the differentiated pay plan <br />chosen the instructional personnel, the. instructional support staff and administra <br />were included in the plan. This was voted upon by all affected schools. Each sc <br />did not have to participate but each school had to vote on this option. <br />Ms. House indicated that there were several options for adopting Senate Bill <br />including not using any portion of this Bill, using the Performance Based and Flexi <br />Pay portions only, or participating in everything but the Flexible Pay Plan. Cht <br />Hill /Carrboro and orange County chose to participate in Flexible Funding and <br />Differentiated Pay Plan. The chapel Hill - Carrboro and the Orange County School Sysi <br />Improvement and Accountability Plans are on file in the permanent agenda file in <br />Clerk's office. <br />The first part of the Bill dealt with Performance Based Student Accountability. Ll <br />School District Improvement Plans were incorporated by each school into a personal. <br />Improvement Plan to help reach the goal of student accountability. The next part of <br />Bill is the Differentiated Pay Plan which allows for instructional and support staf <br />receive additional compensation. This'Bill allows for greater flexibility in perform <br />of one's job in return for greater student performance accountability. Alterna <br />approaches are encouraged under this Bill and the state's mandate does not need ti <br />followed in all instances. Creativity in problem solving was encouraged. <br />;es <br />to <br />it <br />s <br />s <br />1 <br />II <br />le <br />el <br />cal <br />zed <br />ive <br />be <br />Dr. Lunsford presented an overview of Orange-County schools' Implementation Plan for <br />Senate Bill II. This plan has been submitted to the State but it has not yet k een <br />approved. Orange County schools have 37 Student Performance goals. Those goals are listed <br />in this Plan which is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office. He mentioned <br />that one goal they have been, striving toward even before senate Bill II is the attendance <br />averages in grades A -12 and they have been making significant progress. The issue of <br />dropouts is also of critical importance. Last year they reduced this dropout rate by <br />30 % +. The overall goal is to have a dropout rate no higher than the state average. 'He <br />also mentioned that the competency testing goals for mathematics and writing <br />objective /essay are going to cause all school systems some difficulty. This diffic lty <br />is that the State staff has established -a standard but they have changed the way that the <br />competency is measured. This will throw the data collection off for the next three ye rs. <br />He pointed out the importance of the statistical data which is listed in the pla as <br />Student Performance Goals Annual Benchmarks. <br />Commissioner Hartwell indicated that he had been told of a general trend toward mo ing <br />away from the California Achievement Tests and toward end -of- course testing. He a ked <br />who would create the end -of- course test? <br />Lunsford indicated that the Legislation calls for State Board's staff to create tk+- <br />end -of- course and end -of -grade tests. The intent of the end -of- course test -is to a%. -.. <br />a body of questions that will focus on the specific competency outlined in the s ate <br />