Orange County NC Website
34 <br /> Additionally, as the County has worked with the Orange Water and Sewer <br /> Authority to determine the conditions needed to utilize OWASA's lands around <br /> the Cane Creek Reservoir, some residents have expressed worries about the <br /> introduction of hikers into backwoods areas of the County. However, at the same <br /> time, other residents have indicated excitement at the possibility for having such <br /> a trail feature available for their and the community's use. <br /> The unusual setting of this part of the MST is important, because the trail <br /> planning process of the last 16 months has worked to try and balance the many <br /> different perceived opportunities and challenges of siting the trail in such an area. <br /> By its very nature, the siting of the MST route has required considerable <br /> exploration of maps, roadways and the lands of southwestern Orange County. It <br /> is very different, for example, from park master planning. In that case, the <br /> boundaries of the park are known, and there are generally a set of desired <br /> facilities and amenities that can be developed and located. But siting a trail like <br /> the MST provides no fixed location — in fact the determination of possible routes <br /> is in itself the major part of the exercise. That lack of fixed guidance and <br /> boundaries creates a vacuum of sorts, and at times this made for challenges (for <br /> both residents and staff) in finding the right path for the MST. <br /> The County began a community meeting oriented process in April of 2016, with <br /> limited early success. For the remainder of the project, the introduction of a <br /> professional facilitator (Andy Sachs of the Dispute Settlement Center) helped <br /> bridge a number of communication gaps and the "vacuum" and lack of clarity this <br /> more ambiguous process was forced to start with. Another tool to help with this <br /> challenge was the creation of a "Frequently Asked Questions" or"FAQ" <br /> document which includes responses from experts in the legal, fire and public <br /> safety, and forestry fields among others (please see attached FAQ document). <br /> A timeline is provided in the materials that accompany this memo showing the <br /> three community meetings and other actions along the way that led to a March <br /> 2017 final community meeting and the proposed route that is reflected herein. <br /> 2. The Map of Proposed and Alternate Routes <br /> As noted above, this type of trail planning exercise was very different from most <br /> parks and open space master plans where the site is known and the question is <br /> about the location and type of facilities. In this case, it was the "site" itself that <br /> was the challenge. <br /> Using the statewide master plan and the comments at the community meetings <br /> (including the map-drawing station exercise on September 19, 2016), staff <br /> gathered this information along with maps and data in the winter and spring of <br /> 2017 and attempted to identify a preferred trail route. As may be quickly <br /> discerned, there are many possible routes that the MST could take to connect <br /> 2 <br />