Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
Agenda - 05-16-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-16-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 8:09:41 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 10:15:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> 1 number of stations and the least economic advantage. He said this plan had to work for both <br /> 2 counties and GoTriangle. <br /> 3 Commissioner Jacobs said he thinks the plan is now in a good place, and the BOCC <br /> 4 has tried to protect Orange County's financial interest. He said two other items were promised <br /> 5 to the voters in 2012, with the first being the Hillsborough train station, which is still intact and <br /> 6 will be the first thing that Orange County will see as part of this project. <br /> 7 Commissioner Jacobs said the County must fund buses as much as possible, as bus <br /> 8 service was the second item promised in 2012. He said there is some indication that other <br /> 9 monies can be found within the new executive transportation administration of the state. <br /> 10 Commissioner Jacobs said there is a basic principle here, that this community is larger <br /> 11 than just Orange County, and there is something to be said in being able to work with one's <br /> 12 neighbors towards the greater common good, and this project is a way to do that. He said not <br /> 13 all decisions are clear-cut, but the world requires little leaps of faith at certain times. He said if <br /> 14 Orange County is fiscally protected, he is willing to take a leap of faith. <br /> 15 Commissioner Jacobs thanked Chair Dorosin for his work on the negotiations, as well <br /> 16 as Commissioner Wendy Jacobs and Ellen Reckhow from Durham County. He said he trusts <br /> 17 that if concerns arise, the County's partners will work through them, and he hoped the County <br /> 18 could build the same level of trust with GoTriangle. He thanked Orange County staff, especially <br /> 19 Travis Myren, GoTriangle staff, and John Roberts. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br /> 22 delay a decision until further negotiations can occur between Orange County, Durham County <br /> 23 and GoTriangle; to replace the language contained in item #15 of the current Cost Share <br /> 24 Agreement pertaining to mediation and arbitration, and replace it with language used in the <br /> 25 Cost Share Agreement seen on April 20th <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Commissioner McKee said GoTriangle needed a decision by April 30th not April 27th. He <br /> 28 said he is convinced, that without this language change in Item 15, the BOCC will be severely <br /> 29 limited in controlling its own destiny. He said the language contained in item #15 speaks to <br /> 30 arbitration, which leads to a panel making the decisions, not the BOCC. He said the language <br /> 31 from the April 20th iteration of the Cost Sharing Agreement allows for good faith efforts to reach <br /> 32 an agreement about cost overruns, or undesignated funding shortfalls, and allows either BOCC <br /> 33 to vote to withdraw from the agreement, and amend its transit plan accordingly. <br /> 34 Commissioner McKee said he prefers this language as it does not allow for easy or <br /> 35 immediate withdrawal, but allows an option for withdrawal. He said the language proposed this <br /> 36 evening does not allow for consensus, because Durham County and GoTriangle refuse to <br /> 37 discuss making this linguistic change. He said item #15 may be used in business or other <br /> 38 scenarios, but he feels that Orange County must have a way to maintain control over its own <br /> 39 destiny. <br /> 40 Commissioner Jacobs said he had some of the same concerns as Commissioner <br /> 41 McKee about protecting Orange County's interest, and he called Durham County out on it <br /> 42 yesterday. He said Orange County's concerns about protecting its own interests were <br /> 43 mischaracterized as unilateral withdrawal, which was never the intent. He said he spoke with <br /> 44 GoTriangle staff and two Durham County Commissioners, and he feels confident that if all <br /> 45 partners are acting in good faith, then progress can continue. He said Durham County has <br /> 46 acted this way thus far, and he decided to stand down on opposing the language. He said he <br /> 47 never expects to get to the point of the situation described in #15. <br /> 48 Chair Dorosin said the language in #15 needs to be taken in context with the previous <br /> 49 paragraphs, which he read. He said the important parts are the meetings and conferring <br /> 50 meetings, which insure there is a process in place, with many opportunities for discussion and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.