Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> :1 Fin Pell I He Ifh Crlf rl <br /> 2 Minimum Aggregate IDSC11 <br /> 3 ILOB (II n ti l IL.II T) 10.108 <br /> Ii� <br /> 4 Grant u,nded II 0113s (Ilnitial IL....II II) 1.31x <br /> TIIFIIA & State of Good Repair it 10.07 <br /> 6 Minimum Cash Balance II7urin ;Construrction <br /> r <br /> Orange (Fiscal Year) $4,382,360 (2019) <br /> 8 17u,rham (Fiscal Year) $3,42 X3523 (202() <br /> 9 Minimum Cash Balance After Construction <br /> 1..0 Orange (Fiscal Year) $.1 6,353,3(5 (2029) <br /> 1 1.. .. IL urh m (Fiscal Year) $3,410,091(203 ) <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Ted Cole said it changed cash balances to the tune of about $83,000. <br /> 4 Chair Dorosin said the minimum cash available for Orange County between scenarios z <br /> 5 and ee would go down, due to the percentage change from 16.5% to 16%. He asked if there is <br /> 6 a reason why Durham's also goes down (page 13 of abstract - last 4 lines). He said it could just <br /> 7 be an anomaly and to move on in the discussion. <br /> 8 Commissioner McKee referred to attachment B, page 13, line 80, and said previously <br /> 9 the minimum cash balance was $210,000 in 2045, and now, under scenario ee, the minimum <br /> 10 cash balance is $16 million. He asked if there is a reason for the radical change. <br /> 11 Ted Cole said an element of it will be driven by shifts in percentage allocation in capital <br /> 12 and operations. He referred to line 68, and said, as one goes across, the amount of debt being <br /> 13 issued is going up, and less is being financed with cash and more with debt, which will build the <br /> 14 reserves. He said one of the other key drivers is the assumption on how much is funded with <br /> 15 debt and when. <br /> 16 Commissioner McKee asked if the total sum of money spent by Orange County in 2062 <br /> 17 could be identified, including interest, financing costs, construction, pay as you go (not principal) <br /> 18 tax revenues, in kind, etc. <br /> 19 Ted Cole said he may need to get back to Commissioner McKee on this number. <br /> 20 Commissioner McKee said he asked this question as he has seen the figures move so <br /> 21 much in the last few weeks, and he has had a hard time keeping up and understanding the <br /> 22 amounts. He asked if this information could be provided by the end of the meeting. <br /> 23 Commissioner Marcoplos requested to know the projected revenues for this period of <br /> 24 time, as well. <br /> 25 Commissioner Marcoplos referred to the development funds, and said a few weeks ago <br /> 26 there was $130 million in this fund (page 7, line 7-9), and now there is $65 million in this fund. <br /> 27 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the potential uses for these funds could be identified. <br /> 28 Chair Dorosin said on attachment B, lines 23-25, these funds are shown to be the same <br /> 29 in scenarios c, m and z, with a slight variation in ee. <br /> 30 Commissioner Marcoplos said but it started at $130 million. <br /> 31 Patrick McDonough, GoTriangle Manager of Planning and Transit Oriented <br /> 32 Development, said last year it was thought that there may be an opportunity to leverage federal <br /> 33 funds to achieve goals deemed important by Orange and Durham counties, such as affordable <br /> 34 housing. He said the idea here is that, under joint development and the New Starts regulations, <br /> 35 if there is development around the stations, as opposed to a parking deck only, then local <br /> 36 dollars can be leveraged for federal matches. He said the $65 million would be the potential <br /> 37 local dollars, and the other$65 could be matched with federal dollars. <br />