Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-13-2006-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 06-13-2006
>
Agenda - 06-13-2006-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:41:59 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/13/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060613
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michelle Kempinski: Are you using the 85-acre tract to calculate the number of lots? <br />Bruce Ballentine: The density of the two parent tracts is included, <br />Michelle Kempinski: Previously we used different numbers when calculating the open space. Why not <br />use the same numbers? <br />Glenn Bowles: These can be considered estate lots, which use different calculations. The residual lot can <br />be considered as an estate lot, and all open space in it, We based the open space calculation on the <br />subdivision as submitted, The Tanaka fract is not actually a part of the preliminary subdivision, but since <br />it is a part of the parent tract, the area cannot be further subdivided, <br />Robert Davis: This is no longer part of the subdivision, <br />Bruce Ballentine: 221ots is the absolute maximum that could ever be developed on the two parent tracts. <br />Glenn Bowles: The Ordinance specifies the order to check the numbers, Step 1 is to calculate the yield <br />analysis. Once the subdivision is established, step 2 is to calculate open space of the subdivision. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: So, by removing the Tanaka fract from the subdivision, it cannot be further <br />subdivided in the future? <br />Robert Davis: The density only allows one or two lots on the Tanaka tract, which will not change, The <br />density calculation including the Tanaka tract was used in determining the density. That goes with the lot <br />of record. <br />.Judith Wegner: What power does the Planning Board have regarding the assumptions for sustainable <br />water supply and usage? <br />Glenn Bowles: North Carolina water laws prescribe a reasonable use doctrine, Existing and future <br />potential property owners have reasonable expectations of use of the groundwater, State law does not <br />specify those levels, <br />Judith Wegner: I understand the rights issue, I'm questioning more the linkage between the regulatory <br />capacity and use as it applies to the allowable density, How does the water draw apply? <br />Glenn Bowles: We use the USGS Study that was done in the 1990s that suggested that density of 2-3 <br />acres per lot could be sustained under natural conditions based on normal groundwater flow, <br />Judith Wegner: It would seem we have the density protocol regulations that don't say for us to try to <br />regulate water usage. <br />Jay Bryan: We don't have water regulatory authority. <br />3~ <br />Renee Price-Saunders: We are waiting to hear from Geoff Gledhill, County Attorney as to what we can <br />do about establishing thresholds for water usage. As we've seen from the various presentations, this is a <br />complicated subject, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.