Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
E2 Q [1; 1r <br /> ,4 <br /> additions were not included in the text that was <br /> presented at public hearing. Two options are <br /> available to the Planning Board. One is to approve <br /> the decision of the Town of Chapel Hill and include <br /> similar wording. The other option is to stay <br /> strictly with what was advertised and presented at <br /> public hearing. If the Board of County <br /> Commissioners decides on the second option, then it <br /> would be forwarded to the Chapel Hill . <br /> Collins continued that the Town of Carrboro, in its <br /> resolution, made the following addition: <br /> Amend the Joint Planning Agreement to <br /> incorporate the 13-point agreement, and to <br /> provide for a sliding scale which accommodates <br /> the impervious surface restrictions contained in <br /> the 13-Point Agreement. <br /> Roy Williford, Planning Director for Carrboro,. <br /> indicated the intent is to incorporate the 13-Point <br /> Agreement within the Joint Planning Agreement, in <br /> its entirety, at this time. <br /> Collins responded that he has the same concern he <br /> expressed with the Town of Chapel Hill ' s resolution, <br /> that more is being asked for than was advertised and <br /> presented at public hearing. The options for the <br /> Planning Board are the same as with the resolution • <br /> from Chapel Hill . <br /> Burklin asked about the items which were not <br /> presented at public hearing. Collins responded that <br /> the impervious surface ratio standards were of <br /> particular concern. <br /> Jacobs noted that impervious surface ratios were <br /> discussed by citizens at the public hearing. <br /> Collins responded that they were discussed but were <br /> not advertised nor presented at the public hearing <br /> as part of proposed amendments to the Joint <br /> Planning Agreement or Land Use Plan. <br /> Lewis noted that none of the landowners concerns <br /> have been addressed and questioned support the <br /> amendments until such time as the concerns are <br /> addressed. Lewis continued that he could not <br /> support the amendments until this was done. <br /> MOTION: Lewis moved that the Planning Board recommend to the <br /> Board of Commissioners that they do nothing in the <br /> watershed until something concrete is done <br /> to address the financial concerns of the landowners . <br /> Seconded by Boland. <br /> • <br />