Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
8 <br /> D <br /> Planning Staff would have less time to review <br /> and consider the concept plans. Crudup <br /> responded that previously Planning Board <br /> action was included in the time frame so this <br /> could actually give the Planning Staff more <br /> review time than before. <br /> Collins noted that with abstracts being <br /> revised until final agenda preparation, he <br /> felt the time frame proposed by the Planning <br /> Staff to be sufficient. <br /> Best noted that the Board of Commissioners <br /> was concerned that plans be expedited and not <br /> be held up unnecessarily. He continued that <br /> he was concerned that sufficient time be <br /> allotted so that plans would be complete and <br /> important items not be missing when the <br /> concept plans are submitted to the Planning <br /> Board. He felt this would not be a help to <br /> the applicant/developer. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval of Agenda Items 10 a(1 ) , <br /> Zoning Ordinance Article 2 . 3 . 3 .2 - Board of <br /> Adjustment Administration, 10 b( l) , Suubdivision <br /> Regulations Section IV-B-8-e/g <br /> Required Land Use Buffers/Waiver of Buffer <br /> Requirements, and 10 b(2) , Subdivision <br /> Regulations Section III-D-1-b Planning Department <br /> Review Procedures (Major Concept Plans) as <br /> recommended by the Planning Staff . Seconded by <br /> Reid. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #11: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING (2/28/90) <br /> a. Special Meeting - March 28, 1990 <br />