Orange County NC Website
g.-; - 9d <br /> • <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: ORANGE COUNTY B ARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> FROM: MARVIN COLLINS, PLANNING DIRECTOR <br /> DATE: APRIL 2, 1990 <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LIMITS - <br /> UNIVERSITY LAKE WATERSHED <br /> COPIES: JOHN •LINK, COUNTY MANAGER <br /> GEOFFREY GLEDHILL, COUNTY ATTORNEY / . <br /> As part of the Administration' s recommeridat ion on proposed <br /> amendments to the Zoning Ordinance (Action Agenda Item #K-E) , <br /> a modification to the Planning Director' s sliding scale of <br /> impervious surface ratios was proposed. <br /> The Planning Board' s rationale for recommending the <br /> modification was to establish more incentive for the creation <br /> of larger=than-5-acre lots. The same basic limits of 6% for <br /> 5-acre lots and 12% for 2-acre lots would still apply. <br /> However, a change would result for lots larger than 5 acres. <br /> Instead of a 4% cap at 6 acres, the 4% cap would occur when <br /> lot sizes reached 7 acres in size. <br /> Initially, the modification was viewed by the Administration <br /> as an enhancement of the scale. The benefits to be derived, <br /> however, are only for lots between 6. 1 and 7. 0 acres in size. <br /> Once 7. 0 acres exceeded, the amount of impervious surface <br /> permitted is the same, not only for the Planning Board and <br /> Planning Director' s proposal, but for the 13--point agreement <br /> as well (see attached chart and graph) . <br /> - '14hi, Ie the proposal by. the Planning Board may have merit, the <br /> - -"' AthainiBtration feels that adherence to the basic strategy as <br /> = Y'. i e%o fort 2-acre lots it with' sliding cscale) y is c,t 5-acre lots <br /> desirable <br /> .c ;::▪ approach. The modification as proposed by the Planning Board <br /> • ",. C Old be evaluated further as part of the 13-point agreement. <br />