Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-02-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 04-02-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 4:48:27 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 4:38:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/2/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ga 7 4 <br /> recommendation with Alternative #2 (attachment to <br /> these minutes) . Seconded by Best. <br /> Collins asked if the Board preferred Alternative #2 <br /> as presented at public hearing to the revised <br /> version on page 49 of the agenda. <br /> Jacobs asked if the revision reflected a longer time <br /> frame than April 1991 . <br /> Collins responded it did, since the studies of the <br /> advisability of extending public water and sewer, <br /> and permitting the use of alternative systems would <br /> be completed by April 1991 . Following the receipt <br /> of the studies, the three jurisdictions must have <br /> time to review the proposals and make a decision. <br /> Any prohibition of such services/systems would not <br /> be lifted until a decision by all three <br /> jurisdictions to do so. <br /> Jacobs asked if Collins preferred the revision on <br /> page 49 . Collins responded yes, and Jacobs indicated <br /> he would amend his motion to accept the revision. <br /> Accepted by Best. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed (Lewis, Waddell) . <br /> 11> AGENDA ITEM #4c. Orange County Comprehensive Plan <br /> #4d. Orange County Zoning Atlas <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved approval of the Planning Staff' s <br /> recommendation. Seconded by Best. <br /> Best asked if Eidenier still had concerns about the <br /> deletion of the "Critical Area" . Eidenier responded <br /> that if some land is going to be bought which is <br /> more critical than other, there should be a way to <br /> defining it. <br /> Best continued, asking the reason for deleting the <br /> word "Critical" . Collins responded that the CDM <br /> report indicated the watershed as a whole should be <br /> considered as a critical area, so one zoning <br /> district was proposed with a higher level of <br /> protection. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #4a. Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Text <br /> #4b. Joint Planning Agreement <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to recommend to the Board of County <br /> ‘Ii■ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.