Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
D ° a 7 <br /> D 8 V . <br /> recommendation with Alternative #2 (attachment to <br /> these minutes) . Seconded by Best. <br /> Collins asked if the Board preferred Alternative #2 <br /> as presented at public hearing to the revised <br /> version on page 49 of the agenda. <br /> • Jacobs asked if the revision reflected a longer time <br /> frame than, April 1991 . <br /> Collins responded it did, since the studies of the <br /> advisability of extending public water and sewer, <br /> and permitting the use of alternative systems would <br /> be completed by April 1991 . Following the receipt <br /> of the studies, the three jurisdictions must have <br /> time to review the proposals and make a decision. <br /> Any prohibition of such services/systems would not <br /> be lifted until a decision by all three <br /> jurisdictions to do so. <br /> Jacobs asked if Collins preferred the revision on <br /> page 49 . Colndnhise otiondt�eaccept theobevisdionated <br /> he would ame <br /> Accepted by Best. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed (Lewis, Waddell) . <br /> 0 AGENDA ITEM #4c. Orange County Comprehensive Plan <br /> #4d. Orange County Zoning Atlas <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved approval of the Planning Staff ' s <br /> recommendation. Seconded by Best. <br /> Best asked if Eidenier still had concerns about the <br /> deletion of the "Critical Area" . Eidenier responded <br /> that if some land is going to be bought which is <br /> more critical than other, there should be a way to <br /> defining it. <br /> Best continued, asking the reason for deleting the <br /> word "Critical" . Collins responded that the CDM <br /> report indicated the watershed as a whole should be <br /> considered as a critical area, so one zoning <br /> district was proposed with a higher level of <br /> protection. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #4a. Plan and Text <br /> 4b. Joint Planning Agreement <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to recommend to the Board of County <br />