Orange County NC Website
26 <br /> t <br /> In addition to Joint Planning amendments, the County is considering <br /> amendments in County zoning and subdivision regulations for University <br /> Lake watershed. <br /> we understand that the County Planning Board may discuss University <br /> Lake watershed matters on March 28th. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Impervious surface limits <br /> In recent weeks, the work group has discussed the County staff ' s <br /> recommendation for a sliding scale of impervious surface limits <br /> including 6% for 5-acre lots and 12% for two-acre lots. The County <br /> staff developed this proposal after questions about flexibility for <br /> property owners were raised in a public hearing by the County in <br /> November. The hearing was on revisions to the County' s interim <br /> watershed standards for University Lake watershed. <br /> The County staff 's proposed imperviousness limits are less protective <br /> than those recommended by the work group last fall. OWASA staff has <br /> analyzed the County proposal and projected its effect on University <br /> Lake water quality. <br /> When combined with other proposed modifications to the Camp Dresser <br /> McKee recommendation, the proposed County impervious surface limits <br /> would contribute to a 36%, estimated degradation compared to present III <br /> water quality in the lake. <br /> The Chatham-Orange work Group's proposal in October included <br /> imperviousness limits of 4% for lots of 5 or more acres, 6% for 2 acre <br /> lots and 12% for existing lots less than 2 acres. On the basis of the <br /> Camp Dresser McKee model for projecting water quality from allowable <br /> development patterns, OWASA staff has estimated that the October, 1989 <br /> work group proposal would mean a 28% degradation from present water <br /> quality. <br /> Camp, Dresser McKee estimated its own recommendations would mean a 17% <br /> degradation in water quality. <br /> We believe that development of lots in subdivisions in the future <br /> should be subject to the impervious surface limits recommended by Camp <br /> Dresser and McKee, or alternatively, as proposed by the work group in <br /> October. We believe that future development can be designed with the <br /> impervious surface limits in mind, and that there is greater <br /> flexibility in designing future development than in the case of <br /> existing recorded lots. <br /> Amendments to the Joint Planning Agreement and Land Use Plan <br /> The County staff has proposed amending the Joint Planning Agreement to <br /> refer to University Lake watershed area rather than water quality <br /> critical area in the definition of Rural Buffer. The present Water <br /> Quality critical Area includes areas immediately around the Lake and <br /> tributary streams and creeks. <br />